首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Widening following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Various Modalities of Fixation: A Prospective Observational Study
【24h】

Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Widening following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Various Modalities of Fixation: A Prospective Observational Study

机译:使用各种固定方式重建前交叉韧带后股骨和胫骨隧道加宽:一项前瞻性观察研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Bone tunnel enlargement after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACL-R) is a well-accepted phenomenon but there are very few published data comparing the extent of tunnel widening by various methods of fixation after ACL-R.Aim: To compare the femoral and tibial tunnel widening following ACL-R with different methods of fixation using CT scan.Materials and Methods: This one year prospective study included all patients with chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury who underwent primary arthroscopic ACL-R using tripled hamstring tendon autograft. The graft was fixed to the tibial tunnel by Interference Screw (IFS) or Suture Disc (SD) and to the femoral tunnel by IFS, SD, Cross-Pin (CP) or Endo-button CL (Smith & Nephew). The widening of the tibial and femoral tunnels in different methods of fixation was assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at 12 months follow-up; and was compared using paired sample test.Results: A total of 63 patients were included in the study of which 58 (92%) were males and 5 (8%) were females, with a mean age of 29.1 ± 5.9 years. The tibial tunnel widening at one year follow-up was 1.680 ± 1.08794 (19.37%) and 1.517 ± 0.94834 mm (17.39%) by IFS and SD methods respectively. Femoral tunnel widening at one year follow-up was 1.294 ± 0.231, 1.809 ± 0.912, 1.320 ± 0.238, 1.779 ± 0.889 mm by IFS, SD, EB, and CP methods respectively. Femoral tunnel widening following suture disc method of fixation was very highly significant (p<0.001) in comparison with other methods.Conclusion: Femoral tunnel and tibial tunnel widening varies with different methods of fixation and was maximum with suture disc method compared to others at one year follow-up after ACL-R
机译:简介:前交叉韧带重建术(ACL-R)引起的骨隧道扩大是一种公认​​的现象,但很少有已发表的数据可以比较通过ACL-R固定后各种固定方法扩大隧道的程度。材料和方法:这项为期一年的前瞻性研究包括所有使用三重绳肌腱自体移植进行初次关节镜检查的慢性前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的患者。 。移植物通过干涉螺钉(IFS)或缝合线盘(SD)固定到胫骨隧道,并通过IFS,SD,十字钉(CP)或Endo-button CL(Smith&Nephew)固定到股骨隧道。在12个月的随访中,通过计算机断层扫描(CT)评估了采用不同固定方法的胫骨和股骨隧道的宽度。结果:本研究共纳入63例患者,其中男性58例(92%),女性5例(8%),平均年龄29.1±5.9年份。通过IFS和SD方法,随访一年的胫骨隧道加宽分别为1.680±1.08794(19.37%)和1.517±0.94834mm(17.39%)。通过IFS,SD,EB和CP方法,随访一年的股骨隧道宽度分别为1.294±0.231、1.809±0.912、1.320±0.238、1.779±0.889 mm。与其他方法相比,缝线盘法固定后的股骨隧道拓宽非常显着(p <0.001)。 ACL-R之后的一年随访

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号