...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Evaluation of Treatment Responses and Failures of Intensive Care Unit Acquired Blood Stream Infections
【24h】

Evaluation of Treatment Responses and Failures of Intensive Care Unit Acquired Blood Stream Infections

机译:重症监护病房获得性血流感染的治疗反应和失败评估

获取原文

摘要

Blood Stream Infections (BSI) are the second or the third most common infections acquired in Intensive Care Units (ICU) following pulmonary infections. Risk factors likely to affect response to treatment in BSI?s have been investigated in several studies. However, there have not been any studies in which the predictors of treatment failures have been evaluated to this extent.Aim: To investigate the treatment response of patients admitted to the ICU with acquired BSI cases and the predictors of treatment failures.Materials and Methods: The study was based on a cohort study design in which data were collected from all patients with admission to ICU >48 hours during one year. According to the resolution of signs and symptoms of infection, treatment outcomes (n=70) were stratified into two cohorts: 1) successful (n=20); and 2) failure (n=50) treatment. Following risk factors affecting the responses were recorded: source and severity of bacteraemia; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores; isolated pathogens and resistance profile; appropriate antibiotic initiation; and catheter removal time. Fisher exact tests, contingency coefficients, t-tests, Mann-Whitney-U-test and logistic regression analysis was used to examine risk factors associated with treatment failure predictors.Results: The high levels of APACHE II detected on the third day of the treatment (OR=1.151) and delayed appropriate treatment with respect to the onset of bacteraemia (OR=1.532) were independent risk factors for treatment failure. The subgroup analyses revealed that other concomitant infections (78%) and superinfection (40%) were the most frequent reasons in the treatment failures.Conclusion: Delayed appropriate treatment was found to be the most crucial independent reason for treatment failure. Besides, other concomitant infections and superinfection are mostly observed other significant reasons for treatment failure.
机译:血流感染(BSI)是继肺部感染后在重症监护病房(ICU)中获得的第二或第三最常见的感染。几项研究已经调查了可能影响BSI治疗反应的危险因素。但是,还没有任何研究可以评估到这种程度的治疗失败的预测因素。目的:调查因获得性BSI病例而入住ICU的患者的治疗反应以及治疗失败的预测因素。< b>材料与方法:本研究基于一项队列研究设计,该研究收集了一年中所有入院ICU> 48小时的患者的数据。根据感染体征和症状的解决方案,将治疗结果(n = 70)分为两个队列:1)成功(n = 20); 2)治疗失败(n = 50)。记录了影响反应的以下危险因素:菌血症的来源和严重程度;急性生理和慢性健康评估II(APACHE II)和顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)分数;分离的病原体和耐药性适当的抗生素启动;和导管移除时间。 Fisher精确检验,偶然性系数,t检验,Mann-Whitney-U检验和logistic回归分析用于检查与治疗失败预测因子相关的危险因素。结果:第三天检测到高水平的APACHE II关于菌血症发作的治疗(OR = 1.151)和延迟适当治疗(OR = 1.532)是治疗失败的独立危险因素。亚组分析显示,其他并发感染(78%)和重感染(40%)是治疗失败的最常见原因。结论:发现延迟适当治疗是治疗失败的最关键的独立原因。此外,其他伴随感染和重复感染大多是治疗失败的其他重要原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号