首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Intra-Operative Fluid Management in Adult Neurosurgical Patients Undergoing Intracranial Tumour Surgery: Randomised Control Trial Comparing Pulse Pressure Variance (PPV) and Central Venous Pressure (CVP)
【24h】

Intra-Operative Fluid Management in Adult Neurosurgical Patients Undergoing Intracranial Tumour Surgery: Randomised Control Trial Comparing Pulse Pressure Variance (PPV) and Central Venous Pressure (CVP)

机译:接受颅内肿瘤手术的成人神经外科患者的术中液体管理:比较脉搏压方差(PPV)和中心静脉压(CVP)的随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Fluid management in neurosurgery presents specific challenges to the anaesthesiologist. Dynamic para-meters like Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) have been used successfully to guide fluid management.Aim: To compare PPV against Central Venous Pressure (CVP) in neurosurgical patients to assess hemodynamic stability and perfusion status.Materials and Methods: This was a single centre prospective randomised control trial at a tertiary care centre. A total of 60 patients undergoing intracranial tumour excision in supine and lateral positions were randomised to two groups (Group 1, CVP n=30), (Group 2, PPV n=30). Intra-operative fluid management was titrated to maintain baseline CVP in Group 1(5-10cm of water) and in Group 2 fluids were given to maintain PPV less than 13%. Acid base status, vital signs and blood loss were monitored.Results: Although intra-operative hypotension and acid base changes were comparable between the groups, the patients in the CVP group had more episodes of hypotension requiring fluid boluses in the first 24 hours post surgery. {CVP group median (25, 75) 2400ml (1850, 3110) versus PPV group 2100ml (1350, 2200) p=0.03} The patients in the PPV group received more fluids than the CVP group which was clinically significant. {2250 ml (1500, 3000) versus 1500ml (1200, 2000) median (25, 75) (p=0.002)}. The blood loss was not significantly different between the groups The median blood loss in the CVP group was 600ml and in the PPV group was 850 ml; p value 0.09.Conclusion: PPV can be used as a reliable index to guide fluid management in neurosurgical patients undergoing tumour excision surgery in supine and lateral positions and can effectively augment CVP as a guide to fluid management. Patients in PPV group had better hemodynamic stability and less post operative fluid requirement.
机译:简介:神经外科中的液体管理对麻醉师提出了特殊的挑战。动态参数如脉冲压力变化(PPV)已成功用于指导液体管理。目的:为了比较神经外科患者的PPV与中心静脉压(CVP),以评估血液动力学稳定性和灌注状态。三级护理中心的单中心前瞻性随机对照试验。总共60例接受仰卧和侧卧位颅内肿瘤切除的患者被随机分为两组(第1组,CVP n = 30),(第2组,PPV n = 30)。调整术中输液以维持第1组(5-10cm水)的基线CVP,第2组输液以保持PPV低于13%。结果:尽管两组的术中低血压和酸碱变化相当,但CVP组患者在术后24小时内发生了更多的低血压发作,需要输注液体。 {CVP组中位数(25,75)2400ml(1850,3110)相对于PPV组2100ml(1350,2200)p = 0.03} PPV组患者比CVP组接受更多的输液,这在临床上具有重要意义。 {2250 ml(1500,3000)与1500ml(1200,2000)中位数(25,75)(p = 0.002)}。两组之间的失血量无明显差异。CVP组的中位数失血为600ml,PPV组的中位数失血为850ml。 p值0.09。结论:PPV可以作为可靠的指标来指导接受仰卧和侧卧位肿瘤切除手术的神经外科患者的液体管理,并可以有效地提高CVP作为液体管理的指南。 PPV组患者的血流动力学稳定性更好,术后液体需求较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号