...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Assessment Of Satisfaction Among Patients Attending Surgical Outpatient
【24h】

Assessment Of Satisfaction Among Patients Attending Surgical Outpatient

机译:外科门诊患者满意度的评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To find out patient satisfaction with the Surgical Outpatient Department in Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda which is a tertiary care teaching hospital using Concise OPD User Satisfaction Scale.Methodology: From August 2009 to January 2010, only new patients attending the surgical OPD of Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda were included in this observational study after taking informed consent. The Concise Outpatient Department User Satisfaction Scale was used to measure patient satisfaction. The items in this score were (i) physical environment, (ii) equipment and facilities, (iii) appointment arrangement, (iv) waiting time, (v) service of the dispensary, (vi) support staff (vii) physician?s professionalism, (viii) explanation given by the case physician, (ix) consultation time. Results: A total of 510 patients, 308 (60.39%) males and 202 (39.61%) females attending the Surgical Outpatient Department were included in this cross-sectional study from August 2009 to January 2010. Physician?s professionalism scored maximum with a mean ± SD score of 7.71 ± 1.68 and service of dispensary scored minimum with a mean ± SD of 3.67 ± 1.57. Significant difference was found between gender, with males satisfied more in terms of support staff, physician?s professionalism , explanation and consultation time given by physicians.Conclusion: Patient satisfaction level was overall good with the Surgical Outpatient Department. The patients were most satisfied with physician?s professionalism and least satisfied with service of dispensary.
机译:目的:使用Concise OPD用户满意度量表,对位于巴辛达市阿德什医学科学研究所外科门诊部的三级教学医院的患者满意度进行研究。方法:从2009年8月至2010年1月,只有新患者参加在获得知情同意后,巴斯廷达阿德什医学科学研究所的外科OPD纳入了这项观察性研究。简明门诊部用户满意度量表用于衡量患者满意度。此分数中的项目是(i)物理环境,(ii)设备和设施,(iii)约会安排,(iv)等待时间,(v)药房服务,(vi)支持人员(vii)医师专业精神,(viii)案件医生的解释,(ix)咨询时间。结果:从2009年8月至2010年1月,该横断面研究总共纳入了510名患者,其中308名(60.39%)男性和202名(39.61%)女性参加了外科门诊。该医师的专业水平得分最高,平均±SD评分为7.71±1.68,药房服务评分最低,平均±SD为3.67±1.57。性别之间存在显着差异,男性在支持人员,医师的专业水平,解释和咨询时间方面更加满意。结论:外科门诊患者的总体满意度良好。患者对医师的专业水平最满意,对药房的服务最不满意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号