...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Evaluation Of Micronuclei Using Papanicolaou And May Grunwald Giemsa Stain In Individuals With Different Tobacco Habits ? A Comparative Study
【24h】

Evaluation Of Micronuclei Using Papanicolaou And May Grunwald Giemsa Stain In Individuals With Different Tobacco Habits ? A Comparative Study

机译:用帕潘尼古拉和Grunwald Giemsa染色对不同烟草习性个体的微核评价?比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Aims: To compare the Papanicolaou?s (Pap) and May Grunwald?s Giemsa (MGG) staining techniques which are done to detect micronuclei (MN) in exfoliated buccal mucosal cells in individuals with different tobacco habits. To determine the severity of human buccal cell changes which are associated with smoking and smokeless (??chewing??) tobacco (SLT).Methods and Material: A total of 45 male subjects (15 smokers, 15 smokeless tobacco users and 15 non users/ non smokers) were examined. Two cytological smears were taken from the apparently normal buccal mucosa from each individual. 45 smears (1 per individual) were wet fixed and stained with Pap and the remaining 45 smears were air dried and stained with the MGG stain. All the smears were assessed for cellularity and were scored for MN. Statistical analysis used: The ANOVA (one way analysis of variance) was used to analyse the frequency of cells with micronuclei. Bonferroni multiple comparisons were done to determine the significance (p<0.05) of the mean difference.Results: MNs were easily seen in the clear cytoplasm in the Pap smears. Regarding the MGG smears, bacteria and cell debris masked the effect of the MNs as compared to the Pap smears, where the fixative destroyed the bacteria and clearly demarcated the cell boundaries. The score of the MN frequency decreased as we moved from the smokeless tobacco chewers to the smokers and then to the non users and the non smokers. Conclusions: Pap is a better stain as compared to MGG for counting micronuclei. Smokeless tobacco chewers showed an increased number of MNs as compared to the smokers, thus laying emphasis on the greater carcinogenic potential of tobacco which was used in the chewable form.
机译:目的:比较Papanicolaou?s(Pap)和May Grunwald?s Giemsa(MGG)染色技术,以检测具有不同烟草习性的个体脱落的口腔黏膜细胞中的微核(MN)。确定与吸烟和无烟(“咀嚼”)烟草(SLT)相关的人类颊细胞变化的严重程度。方法和材料:共有45名男性受试者(15名吸烟者,15名无烟烟草使用者和15名非使用者) /不吸烟者)。从每个人的表面正常的颊粘膜上取了两次细胞学涂片。湿固定45个涂片(每人1个)并用Pap染色,风干其余45个涂片并用MGG染色。评估所有涂片的细胞性,并对MN进行评分。所使用的统计分析:使用ANOVA(方差单向分析)来分析具有微核的细胞的频率。进行Bonferroni多重比较以确定平均差异的显着性(p <0.05)。结果:在涂片涂片的透明细胞质中很容易看到MN。关于MGG涂片,细菌和细胞碎片掩盖了MNs的作用,而Pap涂片则固定剂破坏了细菌并清楚地划定了细胞边界。随着我们从无烟烟草咀嚼者转移到吸烟者,然后再转移到非使用者和非吸烟者,MN频率的得分下降。结论:与MGG相比,Pap是更好的染色剂,可用于计数微核。与吸烟者相比,无烟烟草咀嚼物显示出更多的MN,因此,人们将重点放在以可咀嚼形式使用的烟草中,具有更大的致癌潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号