首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Quantitative Micro-albuminuriaAssessment from ?Random Voided UrinaryAlbumin: Creatinine Ratio? Versus ?24hours Urinary Albumin Concentration? forScreening of Diabetic Nephropathy
【24h】

Quantitative Micro-albuminuriaAssessment from ?Random Voided UrinaryAlbumin: Creatinine Ratio? Versus ?24hours Urinary Albumin Concentration? forScreening of Diabetic Nephropathy

机译:尿样白蛋白:肌酐比值的随机性尿白蛋白定量微量白蛋白尿评估对吗?24小时尿白蛋白浓度?糖尿病肾病的筛查

获取原文
       

摘要

Aims: This study aims at assessing the predictive value of random urine A:C ratio as a screening method for Micro-albuminuria assessment in DM patients as compared to 24 hours urine albumin.Settings and design: A cross sectional observational study was conducted at a tertiary care centre. One hundred ninty three patients diagnosed with DM were enrolled in the study but 14 participants didn?t turn up with 24 hours urine sample. Thus, 179 people actually participated in the study. Material and Methods: All DM patients who attended Out Patient Departments (OPDs) and In Patient Departments (IPDs) of Medicine, Surgery and Orthopaedics, were enrolled. Proper history about development and duration of DM was taken from the patients. Examination in the form of height and weight measurement to know Body Mass Index (BMI), the Waist: Hip Ratio (W:H ratio) calculated from waist and hip circumference and blood pressure measurement was done. Fasting blood sugar was measured in the study group. [Urine analysis was done for urinary albumin and urinary creatinine]. Two urine samples were collected from each participant; one, 24 hours sample and the other random urine sample. 24 hours urine samples were used to measure urinary albumin concentration while urinary albumin to creatinine ratio was measured from random urine sample.Statistical analysis used: SPSS 17. results: Twenty four hours RUA:C ratio has very good sensitivity and specificity of Sensitivity and specificity of 84.9% and 95.8% respectively,which makes it a better alternative to 24 hours UAC. Negative and positive predictive values of RUA:C ratio method are 0.93 and 0.090 respectively with false negative and false positive rates, 15.1% and 4.2 % respectively.Conclusion: Twenty four hours UAC is considered gold standard for screening of Micro-albuminuria but is cumbersome to collect 24 hours urine sample especially in OPD setup and in female patients. This leads to loss of compliance thereby preventing early diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy. This problem is more impracticable in hilly regions of India. By using random urine sample for screening of Micro-albuminuria in the form of RUA: C in random urine sample that correlates well with 24 hours UAC in 24 hours urine sample,is easier and more practical in Indian scenario especially in diabetics residing in hills.
机译:目的:本研究旨在评估与24小时尿白蛋白相比,DM患者微量白蛋白尿筛查方法的随机尿A:C比值的预测价值。设置和设计:三级护理中心。 193名诊断为DM的患者参加了研究,但14名参与者没有24小时尿液样本。因此,实际有179人参加了这项研究。材料和方法:所有参加过门诊部(OPDs)和内科(IPDs)的内科,外科和骨科的DM患者均入选。从患者那里获得了有关DM发展和持续时间的正确历史。以身高和体重测量的形式进行检查,以了解体重指数(BMI),从腰围和臀围计算出的腰围:臀围比率(W:H比率)和血压测量结果。在研究组中测量空腹血糖。尿液白蛋白和尿肌酐的尿液分析从每个参与者收集两个尿液样本;一个24小时样本,另一个随机尿样本。使用24小时尿液样本测量尿中白蛋白浓度,同时从随机尿液样本中测量尿白蛋白与肌酐之比。使用的统计分析:SPSS 17.结果:二十四小时RUA:C比值具有非常好的敏感性和特异性,敏感性和特异性分别为84.9%和95.8%,这使其成为24小时UAC的更好替代方案。 RUA:C比值法的阴性和阳性预测值分别为0.93和0.090,假阴性和假阳性率分别为15.1%和4.2%。结论:二十四小时UAC被认为是筛查微量蛋白尿的金标准,但比较麻烦收集24小时尿液样本,尤其是在OPD装置和女性患者中。这导致顺应性的丧失,从而阻止了糖尿病性肾病的早期诊断。这个问题在印度的丘陵地区更加不切实际。通过使用随机尿样筛查RUA形式的微量白蛋白尿,随机尿样中的C与24小时尿样中的24小时UAC很好地相关,在印度情况下尤其是在居住在丘陵地区的糖尿病患者中更加容易和实用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号