首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of the GenMark Diagnostics eSensor Respiratory Viral Panel to Real-Time PCR for Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Children
【24h】

Comparison of the GenMark Diagnostics eSensor Respiratory Viral Panel to Real-Time PCR for Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Children

机译:GenMark诊断eSensor呼吸道病毒板与实时PCR检测儿童呼吸道病毒的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A novel eSensor respiratory viral panel (eSensor RVP) multiplexed nucleic acid amplification test (GenMark Diagnostics, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) was compared to laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays for the detection of various respiratory viruses. A total of 250 frozen archived pediatric respiratory specimens previously characterized as either negative or positive for one or more viruses by real-time PCR were examined using the eSensor RVP. Overall agreement between the eSensor RVP and corresponding real-time PCR assays for shared analytes was 99.2% (kappa = 0.96 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.94 to 0.98]). The combined positive percent agreement was 95.4% (95% CI, 92.5 to 97.3); the negative percent agreement was 99.7% (95% CI, 99.4 to 99.8). The mean real-time PCR threshold cycle (CT) value for specimens with discordant results was 39.73 (95% CI, 38.03 to 41.43). Detection of coinfections and correct identification of influenza A virus subtypes were comparable between methods. Of note, the eSensor RVP rhinovirus assay was found to be more sensitive and specific than the corresponding rhinovirus real-time PCR. In contrast, the eSensor RVP adenovirus B, C, and E assays demonstrated some cross-reactivity when tested against known adenovirus serotypes representing groups A through F. The eSensor RVP is robust and relatively easy to perform, it involves a unique biosensor technology for target detection, and its multiplexed design allows for efficient and simultaneous interrogation of a single specimen for multiple viruses. Potential drawbacks include a slower turnaround time and the need to manipulate amplified product during the protocol, increasing the possibility of contamination.
机译:将一种新型的eSensor呼吸道病毒检测板(eSensor RVP)多重核酸扩增试验(GenMark Diagnostics,Inc.,加利福尼亚州卡尔斯巴德)与实验室开发的实时PCR检测方法进行了比较,以检测各种呼吸道病毒。使用eSensor RVP对总共250份先前通过实时PCR表征为一种或多种病毒呈阴性或阳性的冷冻小儿呼吸道标本进行了检查。共享分析物的eSensor RVP和相应的实时PCR分析之间的总体一致性为99.2%(κ= 0.96 [95%置信区间{CI},0.94至0.98])。合并的肯定百分比协议为95.4%(95%CI,92.5至97.3);负百分比一致性为99.7%(95%CI,99.4至99.8)。结果不一致的标本的平均实时PCR阈值循环( C T )值为39.73(95%CI,38.03至41.43)。在两种方法之间,共感染的检测和甲型流感病毒亚型的正确鉴定具有可比性。值得注意的是,发现eSensor RVP鼻病毒测定比相应的鼻病毒实时PCR更为灵敏和特异。相反,当针对代表A组到F组的已知腺病毒血清型进行测试时,eSensor RVP腺病毒B,C和E分析显示出一些交叉反应性。检测和其多重设计允许针对多个病毒对单个样本进行高效且同时的询问。潜在的缺点包括周转时间较慢,以及在操作流程中需要操作扩增产物,从而增加了污染的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号