...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >The Pan Genera Detection Immunoassay: a Novel Point-of-Issue Method for Detection of Bacterial Contamination in Platelet Concentrates
【24h】

The Pan Genera Detection Immunoassay: a Novel Point-of-Issue Method for Detection of Bacterial Contamination in Platelet Concentrates

机译:泛属检测免疫测定:一种检测血小板浓缩液中细菌污染的新型检测点方法

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates (PCs) still represents an ongoing risk in transfusion-transmitted sepsis. Recently the Pan Genera Detection (PGD) system was developed and FDA licensed for screening of bacterial contamination of PCs directly prior to transfusion. The test principle is based on the immunological detection of lipopolysaccharide (for Gram-negative bacteria) or lipoteichoic acid (for Gram-positive bacteria). In the present study we analyzed the applicability of this method with regard to detection limit, practicability, implementation, and performance. PCs were spiked with Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, and five different Klebsiella pneumoniae strains, as well as eight different Escherichia coli strains. The presence of bacteria was assessed by the PGD immunoassay, and bacteria were enumerated by plating cultures. Application of the PGD immunoassay showed that it is a rapid test with a short hands-on time for sample processing and no demand for special technical equipment and instrument operation. The lower detection limits of the assay for Gram-positive bacteria showed a good agreement with the manufacturer's specifications (8.2 × 103 to 5.5 × 104 CFU/ml). For some strains of K. pneumoniae and E. coli, the PGD test showed analytical sensitivities (>106 CFU/ml) that were divergent from the designated values (K. pneumoniae, 2.0 × 104 CFU/ml; E. coli, 2.8 × 104 CFU/ml). Result interpretation is sometimes difficult due to very faint bands. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the PGD immunoassay is an easy-to-perform bedside test for the detection of bacterial contamination in PCs. However, to date there are some shortcomings in the interpretation of results and in the detection limits for some strains of Gram-negative bacteria.
机译:浓缩血小板(PCs)的细菌污染仍然代表着输血传播败血症的持续风险。最近,开发了泛属检测(PGD)系统,并获得了FDA的许可,可在输血之前筛查PC的细菌污染。测试原理基于脂多糖(对于革兰氏阴性菌)或脂蛋白酸(对于革兰氏阳性菌)的免疫学检测。在本研究中,我们就检测限,实用性,实施和性能方面分析了该方法的适用性。在PC上掺入金黄色葡萄球菌,枯草芽孢杆菌和五种不同的肺炎克雷伯菌菌株,以及八种不同的大肠埃希氏菌。 em>株。通过PGD免疫测定法评估细菌的存在,并通过平板培养物计数细菌。 PGD​​免疫测定法的应用表明,它是一种快速的测试方法,用于样品处理,操作时间短,并且不需要特殊的技术设备和仪器操作。革兰氏阳性菌的检测下限与制造商的规格(8.2×10 3 至5.5×10 4 CFU / ml)有很好的一致性。对于某些 K菌株。肺炎 E。大肠杆菌,PGD测试显示分析灵敏度(> 10 6 CFU / ml)与指定值(肺炎克雷伯菌,2.0×10 < sup> 4 CFU / ml; 大肠杆菌,2.8×10 4 CFU / ml)。由于频段很微弱,结果解释有时会很困难。总之,我们的研究表明,PGD免疫测定是一种易于检测的PC细菌污染的床头检测方法。但是,迄今为止,对于某些革兰氏阴性菌菌株的结果解释和检测限存在一些缺陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号