首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of DNA Hybridization and PCR Assays for Detection of Putative Pathogenic Enteroadherent Escherichia coli
【24h】

Comparison of DNA Hybridization and PCR Assays for Detection of Putative Pathogenic Enteroadherent Escherichia coli

机译:DNA杂交和PCR检测法检测假定的致病性肠黏附性大肠杆菌的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

The correlation of the different adherence patterns with DNA probes and PCR primers for the identification of Escherichia coli was analyzed in isolates from children, less than 2 years of age with or without diarrhea, from different regions of Brazil. A total of 1,428 isolates obtained from 338 patients and 322 control children were studied. The enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) adherence factor (EAF) probe was shown to be as good as the HEp-2 adhesion assay for the detection of typical EPEC strains. The DNA probes used to detect diffusely adhering E. coli and enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) showed low sensitivities (64 and 50%, respectively), and the best method of identifying these organisms in clinical research remains the HEp-2 adherence assay. The “bundle-forming pilus” (BFP) and the EAEC PCR assays could be used instead of the DNA probes as a screening method for typical EPEC and EAEC carrying the EAEC probe sequence in the clinical laboratory. In our study, only typical EPEC strains that carried EAF and BFP were associated with acute diarrhea.
机译:在巴西不同地区的2岁以下儿童(有或没有腹泻)分离株中,分析了不同粘附模式与DNA探针和PCR引物鉴定大肠埃希菌的相关性。研究了从338名患者和322名对照儿童获得的1,428株分离株。肠致病性 E。大肠杆菌(EPEC)粘附因子(EAF)探针与用于典型EPEC菌株检测的HEp-2粘附测定法一样好。用于检测弥散粘附的 E的DNA探针。大肠杆菌和肠聚集性 E。大肠杆菌(EAEC)的敏感性较低(分别为64%和50%),在临床研究中鉴定这些生物的最佳方法仍然是HEp-2粘附测定。可以使用“成束菌毛”(BFP)和EAEC PCR分析代替DNA探针,作为临床实验室中典型的带有EAEC探针序列的EPEC和EAEC的筛选方法。在我们的研究中,只有携带EAF和BFP的典型EPEC菌株与急性腹泻有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号