首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of DNA hybridization and PCR assays for detection of putative pathogenic enteroadherent Escherichia coli
【2h】

Comparison of DNA hybridization and PCR assays for detection of putative pathogenic enteroadherent Escherichia coli

机译:DNA杂交和PCR分析检测推定的致病性肠黏附性大肠杆菌的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The correlation of the different adherence patterns with DNA probes and PCR primers for the identification of Escherichia coli was analyzed in isolates from children, less than 2 years of age with or without diarrhea, from different regions of Brazil. A total of 1,428 isolates obtained from 338 patients and 322 control children were studied. the enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) adherence factor (EAF) probe was shown to be as good as the HEp-2 adhesion assay for the detection of typical EPEC strains. the DNA probes used to detect diffusely adhering E. coli and enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) showed low sensitivities (64 and 50%, respectively), and the best method of identifying these organisms in clinical research remains the HEp-2 adherence assay. the bundle-forming pilus (BFP) and the EAEC PCR assays could be used instead of the DNA probes as a screening method for typical EPEC and EAEC carrying the EAEC probe sequence in the clinical laboratory. in our study, only typical EPEC strains that carried EAF and BFP were associated with acute diarrhea.
机译:在巴西不同地区的2岁以下儿童(有或没有腹泻)的分离物中,分析了不同粘附模式与DNA探针和PCR引物用于鉴定大肠杆菌的相关性。研究了从338名患者和322名对照儿童获得的1,428株分离株。肠致病性大肠杆菌(EPEC)粘附因子(EAF)探针与用于典型EPEC菌株检测的HEp-2粘附测定一样好。用于检测弥散性粘附大肠杆菌和肠聚合性大肠杆菌(EAEC)的DNA探针灵敏度低(分别为64%和50%),在临床研究中鉴定这些微生物的最佳方法仍然是HEp-2粘附测定。作为临床实验室中典型的带有EAEC探针序列的EPEC和EAEC的筛选方法,可以使用束形成菌毛(BFP)和EAEC PCR分析代替DNA探针。在我们的研究中,只有携带EAF和BFP的典型EPEC菌株与急性腹泻有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号