首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of the Serodia Treponema pallidum Particle Agglutination, Captia Syphilis-G, and SpiroTek Reagin II Tests with Standard Test Techniques for Diagnosis of Syphilis
【24h】

Comparison of the Serodia Treponema pallidum Particle Agglutination, Captia Syphilis-G, and SpiroTek Reagin II Tests with Standard Test Techniques for Diagnosis of Syphilis

机译:梅毒螺旋体血清凝集,Captia Syphilis-G和SpiroTek Reagin II测试与梅毒诊断标准测试技术的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

We compared the microhemagglutination assay for Treponema pallidum (MHA-TP), a treponemal test, with two other treponemal tests, the Serodia Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TP-PA) assay and the Captia Syphilis-G enzyme immunoassay, using 390 clinical serum samples. We also compared two nontreponemal tests, the rapid plasma Reagin (RPR) card test and the SpiroTek Reagin II test. Agreements of the MHA-TP with the TP-PA test and the Syphilis-G test were 97.4 and 97.7%, respectively. There was 89.2% agreement between the RPR and Reagin II tests. The Reagin II test was more apt to be reactive if the treponemal test was also reactive. We conclude that either the Serodia TP-PA test or the Captia Syphilis-G test is an appropriate substitute for the MHA-TP and that the Spirotek Reagin II test could substitute for the RPR test as a screening test.
机译:我们将梅毒螺旋体(MHA-TP)的微血球凝集试验(MHA-TP)与其他两个梅毒螺旋体试验(Serodia Treponema pallidum 颗粒凝集(TP-PA)试验)进行了比较并使用390个临床血清样本进行Captia Syphilis-G酶免疫测定。我们还比较了两种非耳蜗性测试,即快速血浆Reagin(RPR)卡测试和SpiroTek Reagin II测试。 MHA-TP与TP-PA测试和梅毒-G测试的一致性分别为97.4和97.7%。 RPR和Reagin II测试之间的一致率为89.2%。如果端粒酶测验也具有反应性,则Reagin II测验更倾向于反应性。我们得出结论,无论是Serodia TP-PA测试还是Captia Syphilis-G测试都可以替代MHA-TP,而Spirotek Reagin II测试可以代替RPR测试作为筛查测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号