首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Agar Dilution, Microdilution, E-Test, and Disk Diffusion Methods for Testing Activity of Cefditoren againstStreptococcus pneumoniae
【24h】

Comparison of Agar Dilution, Microdilution, E-Test, and Disk Diffusion Methods for Testing Activity of Cefditoren againstStreptococcus pneumoniae

机译:琼脂稀释,微量稀释,E检验和圆盘扩散法检测头孢妥仑抗肺炎链球菌活性的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

This study evaluated the susceptibility of pneumococci to cefditoren by agar dilution and microdilution methods (both in air) and by E-test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) and disk diffusion methods (both in CO2). By the three MIC tests, the MICs at which 50 and 90% of isolates were inhibited (MIC50s and MIC90s) were, respectively, as follows (in micrograms per milliliter): for the 65 penicillin-susceptible strains tested, 0.016 and 0.03 (by agar dilution), 0.016 and 0.03 (by microdilution), and 0.016 and 0.03 (by E test); for the 68 penicillin-intermediate strains tested, 0.125 and 0.5 (by agar dilution), 0.125 and 0.5 (by microdilution), and 0.25 and 0.5 (by E test); and for the 67 penicillin-resistant strains tested, 1.0 and 1.0 (by agar dilution), 0.5 and 1.0 (by microdilution), and 1.0 and 1.0 (by E test). With tentative cefditoren breakpoints (in micrograms per milliliter) of ≤2.0 (susceptible), 4.0 (intermediate), and ≥8.0 (resistant), all strains were susceptible to cefditoren by agar, microdilution, and E-test results; with breakpoints of ≤1.0, 2.0, and ≥4.0 μg/ml, 97% of strains were cefditoren susceptible by agar dilution results, 98% were susceptible by microdilution results, and 99% were susceptible by E-test results. When microdilution and E-test results were compared to those from the reference agar dilution method, 191 (95.5%) and 183 (91.5%) of strains gave essential agreement (±1 log2dilution); 8 (2.7%) minor discrepancies were found for both methods with a breakpoint of ≤1.0 μg/ml, and no discrepancies were found with a breakpoint of ≤2.0 μg/ml. Disk test results (breakpoint, ≤1.0 μg/ml) produced 2 major and 30 minor errors, with corresponding zone diameters (in millimeters) of ≥20 (susceptible), 17 to 19 (intermediate), and ≤16 (resistant); a ≤2.0-μg/ml breakpoint yielded zone diameters of ≥16 mm (susceptible). All three methods for testing the MIC of cefditoren showed excellent correlation.
机译:这项研究通过琼脂稀释和微稀释方法(在空气中)和E-检验(AB Biodisk,Solna,瑞典)和磁盘扩散方法(在CO 2 中都使用)评估了肺炎球菌对头孢妥伦的敏感性。 。通过这三个MIC测试,分别抑制了50%和90%的分离株(MIC 50 s和MIC 90 s)的MIC如下(以微克计)每毫升):对于65个对青霉素敏感的菌株,分别为0.016和0.03(通过琼脂稀释),0.016和0.03(通过微稀释)以及0.016和0.03(通过E检验);对于测试的68个青霉素中间菌株,分别为0.125和0.5(通过琼脂稀释),0.125和0.5(通过微稀释)以及0.25和0.5(通过E检验);对于测试的67株抗青霉素菌株,分别为1.0和1.0(通过琼脂稀释),0.5和1.0(通过微稀释)以及1.0和1.0(通过E检验)。头孢托仑的试验性断裂点(以微克/毫升计)≤2.0(易感),4.0(中度)和≥8.0(抗性),所有菌株均通过琼脂,微量稀释和E-检验结果易受头孢地汀的影响;断点≤1.0、2.0和≥4.0μg/ ml,琼脂稀释结果易感头孢地仑97%,微量稀释结果易感98%,E检验结果易感99%。将微稀释和E检验结果与参考琼脂稀释法的结果进行比较,菌株191(95.5%)和183(91.5%)的菌株基本吻合(±1 log 2 稀释);两种方法的断点≤1.0μg/ ml均发现8个差异(2.7%),并且断点≤2.0μg/ ml均未发现差异。圆盘测试结果(断裂点,≤1.0μg/ ml)产生2个主要和30个次要误差,相应的区域直径(毫米)≥20(敏感),17至19(中间)和≤16(抗性);断裂点≤2.0-μg/ ml,产生的区域直径≥16mm(敏感)。三种测试头孢托仑MIC的方法均显示出极好的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号