...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of E test and agar dilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia.
【24h】

Comparison of E test and agar dilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia.

机译:E试验和琼脂稀释液对嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌(Xanthomonas)嗜麦芽孢杆菌的药敏试验的比较。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Currently recommended dilution test methods for the determination of antimicrobial susceptibility of Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia are labor-intensive and often impractical in many clinical laboratories. We compared the E test with the agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of 176 clinical isolates of S. maltophilia against 16 antimicrobial agents. The MICs obtained by E test correlated well with those determined by the agar dilution method, with an overall agreement of 94%. Very major and major errors occurred infrequently (0.6 to 2.9%) when testing beta-lactam agents, tobramycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and fluoroquinolones. The E test was found to be accurate and easy to perform. For most antimicrobial agents tested against S. maltophilia, the E test is an acceptable alternative susceptibility test method.
机译:当前推荐的用于确定嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌(Xanthomonas)嗜麦芽孢杆菌的抗生素敏感性的稀释测试方法是劳动密集型的,并且在许多临床实验室中通常是不切实际的。我们比较了E检验和琼脂稀释法对176种嗜麦芽孢杆菌临床分离株对16种抗菌药的药敏试验。通过E检验获得的MIC与通过琼脂稀释法确定的MIC密切相关,总体一致性为94%。测试β-内酰胺类药物,妥布霉素,甲氧苄氨嘧啶-磺胺甲基异恶唑和氟喹诺酮类药物时,很少会出现重大错误(0.6%至2.9%)。发现E测试准确且易于执行。对于大多数针对嗜麦芽孢杆菌的抗微生物剂,E试验是可接受的替代药敏试验方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号