...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of DNA probe, monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
【24h】

Comparison of DNA probe, monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

机译:DNA探针,单克隆抗体酶免疫测定和细胞培养用于检测沙眼衣原体的比较。

获取原文
           

摘要

A total of 201 endocervical specimens were obtained from patients with a clinical or epidemiological history suggestive of chlamydial infection. These specimens were tested by DNA probe (Gen-Probe, San Diego, Calif.) and the IDEIA III (Boots-Celltech, Berkshire, United Kingdom) monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay and compared with cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Discrepancies between cell culture and antigen detection methods were resolved by direct fluorescent-antibody testing. In a population with a 17.4% prevalence, the sensitivities and specificities of these assays were 82.8 and 99.4%, respectively, for the DNA probe assay and 97.1 and 98.1%, respectively, for the IDEIA III.
机译:从临床或流行病学史提示衣原体感染的患者中共获得201份宫颈内膜标本。这些标本通过DNA探针(Gen-Probe,圣地亚哥,加利福尼亚)和IDEIA III(Boots-Celltech,伯克希尔,英国)单克隆抗体酶免疫法进行测试,并与细胞培养进行比较以检测沙眼衣原体。细胞培养和抗原检测方法之间的差异通过直接荧光抗体测试得以解决。在17.4%的患病率人群中,这些测定的敏感性和特异性分别对DNA探针测定为82.8%和99.4%,对IDEIA III分别为97.1%和98.1%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号