...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Laboratory proficiency test results on use of selective media for isolating Pseudomonas cepacia from simulated sputum specimens of patients with cystic fibrosis.
【24h】

Laboratory proficiency test results on use of selective media for isolating Pseudomonas cepacia from simulated sputum specimens of patients with cystic fibrosis.

机译:使用选择性培养基从囊性纤维化患者的痰标本中分离出假单胞菌脓毒症的实验室能力测试结果。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Pseudomonas cepacia colonization of or infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) has been associated with increased morbidity and premature death. However, current data on national incidence may be biased because of interlaboratory differences in the methods of culturing sputa of patients with CF. We conducted three tests to evaluate the proficiency of microbiology laboratories at CF centers in identifying and isolating P. cepacia and to assess the value of using selective media for P. cepacia (P. cepacia agar and oxidation-fermentation polymyxin-bacitracin-lactose medium [OFPBL]) to recover P. cepacia from specimens simulating sputa of patients with CF. In test 1, we evaluated the proficiency of laboratories in identifying P. cepacia. Of 111 laboratories tested, 105 (95%) correctly identified P. cepacia. In test 2, we evaluated the proficiency of laboratories in isolating P. cepacia from simulated CF sputum specimens. Only 36 (32%) of 115 laboratories detected P. cepacia. Recovery of the microorganism was associated with the use of P cepacia agar or OFPBL; 14 (95%) of 15 laboratories using P. cepacia agar or OFPBL (or both) versus 22 (22%) of 100 laboratories not using either medium recovered P. cepacia (P less than 0.0001, Fisher exact test, one tailed). Laboratories failing test 2 were requested to use a selective medium for P. cepacia in a repeat test; 73 (97%) of 75 laboratories using P. cepacia agar or OFPBL (or both) versus 0 of 4 laboratories not using either medium detected P. cepacia (P less than 0.0001, Fisher exact test, one tailed). Our studies show that (i) microbiology laboratories at CF centers are proficient in identifying P. cepacia, and (ii) the use of selective media for P. cepacia enhances recovery of the microorganism in simulated sputum specimens. Therefore, we recommend the use of selective media for P. cepacia in laboratories processing sputa of patients with CF.
机译:囊性纤维化(CF)患者的假单胞菌假面菌定植或感染与发病率增加和过早死亡有关。但是,由于实验室间培养CF患者痰液的方法不同,有关全国发生率的最新数据可能存在偏差。我们进行了三项测试,以评估CF中心的微生物实验室鉴定和分离洋葱败酱病的能力,并评估使用洋葱败酱病的选择性培养基(洋葱败酱琼脂和氧化发酵多粘菌素-细菌素-乳糖培养基[ OFPBL]),以从模拟CF患者痰液的标本中回收洋葱。在测试1中,我们评估了鉴定洋葱假单胞菌的实验室水平。在所测试的111个实验室中,有105个(95%)正确鉴定了洋葱伯克霍尔德菌。在测试2中,我们评估了实验室从模拟CF痰标本中分离洋葱假单胞菌的能力。 115个实验室中只有36(32%)个检测到了洋葱伯克霍尔德菌。微生物的回收与洋葱头孢霉琼脂或OFPBL的使用有关。 15个实验室中有14个(95%)使用洋葱伯劳(P. cepacia)琼脂或OFPBL(或两者皆有),而100个实验室中有22个(22%)没有使用培养基回收的洋葱伯劳(P. 0.0001,Fisher精确检验,有尾巴)。在重复测试中,未通过测试2的实验室被要求对洋葱假单胞菌使用选择性培养基。在75个实验室中,有73个实验室(97%)使用洋葱伯克霍尔德氏菌琼脂或OFPBL(或二者皆有),而在没有使用任何一种培养基的4个实验室中,有0个实验室检测到洋葱伯克霍尔德氏菌(P小于0.0001,Fisher精确检验,有尾巴)。我们的研究表明,(i)CF中心的微生物实验室能够熟练地鉴定洋葱伯克霍尔伯氏菌,并且(ii)使用洋葱伯克霍尔伯氏菌的选择性培养基可提高模拟痰标本中微生物的回收率。因此,我们建议在处理CF患者痰液的实验室中使用洋葱丁酸选择性培养基。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号