...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of different antigen preparations as substrates for use in passive hemagglutination and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of antibody against bovine enteric coronavirus.
【24h】

Comparison of different antigen preparations as substrates for use in passive hemagglutination and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of antibody against bovine enteric coronavirus.

机译:比较不同抗原制剂作为被动血凝的底物和酶联免疫吸附法检测牛肠道冠状病毒的抗体。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purified coronavirus, detergent extracts of purified coronavirus, and virus-infected Madin-Darby bovine kidney cells were evaluated as antigen substrates in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and passive hemagglutination systems. Only detergent-extracted and -unextracted, purified viruses were reactive as antigen substrates in ELISA, whereas all three antigen preparations could be used for sensitization of erythrocytes in the passive hemagglutination assay. The passive hemagglutination system with infected cell extracts exhibited a similar level of sensitivity and specificity to the ELISA system employing purified coronavirus but enabled 300 times more tests to be performed per volume of virus-infected cell culture.
机译:纯化的冠状病毒,纯化的冠状病毒的去污剂提取物和病毒感染的Madin-Darby牛肾细胞在酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和被动血凝系统中作为抗原底物进行评估。在ELISA中,只有去污剂提取物和未提取物的纯化病毒可作为抗原底物起反应,而在被动血凝试验中,所有三种抗原制剂均可用于敏化红细胞。带有感染细胞提取物的被动血细胞凝集系统显示出与采用纯化冠状病毒的ELISA系统相似的敏感性和特异性水平,但是每单位体积的病毒感染细胞培养物可以进行300倍以上的测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号