首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Development and Validation of a Path Length Calculation for Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement
【24h】

Development and Validation of a Path Length Calculation for Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement

机译:颈股动脉脉搏波速度测量路径长度计算的发展与验证

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Current distance measurement techniques for pulse wave velocity (PWV) calculation are susceptible to intercentervariability. The aim of this study was to derive and validate a formula for this distance measurement. Based on carotid femoraldistance in 1183 whole-body magnetic resonance angiograms, a formula was derived for calculating distance. This wascompared with distance measurements in 128 whole-body magnetic resonance angiograms from a second study. The effectsof recalculation of PWV using the new formula on association with risk factors, disease discrimination, and prediction ofmajor adverse cardiovascular events were examined within 1242 participants from the multicenter SUMMIT study (SurrogateMarkers of Micro- and Macrovascular Hard End-Points for Innovative Diabetes Tools) and 825 participants from theCaerphilly Prospective Study. The distance formula yielded a mean error of 7.8 mm (limits of agreement =?41.1 to 56.7 mm;P<0.001) compared with the second whole-body magnetic resonance angiogram group. Compared with an external distancemeasurement, the distance formula did not change associations between PWV and age, blood pressure, or creatinine (P<0.01)but did remove significant associations between PWV and body mass index (BMI). After accounting for differences in age,sex, and mean arterial pressure, intercenter differences in PWV persisted using the external distance measurement (F=4.6;P=0.004), whereas there was a loss of between center difference using the distance formula (F=1.4; P=0.24). PWV odds ratiosfor cardiovascular mortality remained the same using both the external distance measurement (1.14; 95% confidence interval,1.06–1.24; P=0.001) and the distance formula (1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–1.28; P<0.001). A population-derivedautomatic distance calculation for PWV obtained from routinely collected clinical information is accurate and removesintercenter measurement variability without impacting the diagnostic utility of carotid–femoral PWV.
机译:当前用于脉搏波速度(PWV)计算的距离测量技术易受中心间变化的影响。这项研究的目的是导出并验证用于此距离测量的公式。根据1183例全身磁共振血管造影的颈股距,推导了计算距离的公式。这与来自第二项研究的128幅全身磁共振血管造影照片中的距离测量结果进行了比较。在来自多中心SUMMIT研究的1242名参与者中研究了使用新公式重新计算PWV与危险因素,疾病歧视和主要不良心血管事件的预测相关的影响(创新型糖尿病工具的微血管和大血管硬终点的替代标记)来自Caerphilly前瞻性研究的825名参与者。与第二个全身磁共振血管造影照片组相比,该距离公式产生的平均误差为7.8 mm(一致极限=?41.1至56.7 mm; P <0.001)。与外部测距相比,该距离公式不会改变PWV与年龄,血压或肌酐之间的关联(P <0.01),但可以消除PWV与体重指数(BMI)之间的显着关联。在考虑了年龄,性别和平均动脉压的差异后,使用外部距离测量(P = 4.6; P = 0.004),PWV的中心间差异仍然存在,而使用距离公式(F = 1.4; P = 0.24)。使用外部距离测量(1.14; 95%置信区间,1.06-1.24; P = 0.001)和距离公式(1.17; 95%置信区间,1.08-1.28; P <0.001),心血管疾病死亡率的PWV优势比保持相同。 。从常规收集的临床信息中获得的基于人群的PWV自动距离计算是准确的,并且消除了中心间测量的变异性,而不会影响颈动脉PWV的诊断效用。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号