...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Magnetic resonance imaging and Crohn’s disease endoscopic index of severity: Correlations and concordance
【24h】

Magnetic resonance imaging and Crohn’s disease endoscopic index of severity: Correlations and concordance

机译:磁共振成像和克罗恩病内窥镜检查严重程度指数:相关性和一致性

获取原文

摘要

AIM To examine the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic index of severity (CDEIS) in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). METHODS This was a retrospective study of 104 patients with CD that were treated at the Ruijin Hospital between March 2015 and May 2016. Among them, 61 patients with active CD were evaluated before/after treatment. MRI and endoscopy were performed within 7 d. CDEIS was evaluated. MRI parameters included MaRIA scores, total relative contrast enhancement (tRCE), arterial RCE (aRCE), portal RCE (pRCE), delay phase RCE (dRCE), and apparent diffusion coefficient. The correlation and concordance between multiple MRI findings and CDEIS changes before and after CD treatment were examined. RESULTS Among the 104 patients, 61 patients were classified as active CD and 43 patients as inactive CD. Gender, age, disease duration, and disease location were not significantly different between the two groups (all P > 0.05). CRP levels were higher in the active group than in the inactive group (25.12 ± 4.12 vs 5.14 ± 0.98 mg/L, P < 0.001). Before treatment, the correlations between CDEIS and MaRIAs in all patients were r = 0.772 for tRCE, r = 0.754 for aRCE, r = 0.738 for pRCE, and r = 0.712 for dRCE (all MaRIAs, P < 0.001), followed by MRI single indexes. Among the active CD patients, 44 cases were remitted to inactive CD after treatment. The correlations between CDEIS and MaRIAs were r = 0.712 for aRCE, r = 0.705 for tRCE, r = 0.685 for pRCE, and r = 0.634 for dRCE (all MaRIAs, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Arterial MaRIA should be an indicator for CD follow-up and dynamic assessment. CD treatment assessment was not completely concordant between CDEIS and MRI.
机译:目的探讨克罗恩病(CD)患者的磁共振成像(MRI)与内镜严重程度指数(CDEIS)之间的相关性。方法这项回顾性研究于2015年3月至2016年5月期间在瑞金医院接受治疗的104例CD患者中,其中有61例活动CD患者在治疗前后进行了评估。 MRI和内窥镜检查在7 d内进行。对CDEIS进行了评估。 MRI参数包括MaRIA评分,总相对对比度增强(tRCE),动脉RCE(aRCE),门静脉RCE(pRCE),延迟相RCE(dRCE)和表观弥散系数。研究了CD治疗前后多个MRI表现与CDEIS变化之间的相关性和一致性。结果在104例患者中,有61例被归为活动性CD,有43例为非活动性CD。两组之间的性别,年龄,疾病持续时间和疾病位置无显着差异(均P> 0.05)。活动组的CRP水平高于不活动组(25.12±4.12 vs 5.14±0.98 mg / L,P <0.001)。治疗前,所有患者的CDEIS与MaRIAs之间的相关性分别为:tRCE r = 0.772,aRCE r = 0.754,pRCE r = 0.738,dRCE r = 0.712(所有MaRIAs,P <0.001),然后进行MRI单索引。在活动性CD患者中,有44例在治疗后被缓解为非活动性CD。 CDEIS和MaRIAS之间的相关性对于aRCE为r = 0.712,对于tRCE为r = 0.705,对于pRCE为r = 0.685,对于dRCE为r = 0.634(所有MaRIAs,P <0.001)。结论动脉MaRIA应该是CD随访和动态评估的指标。 CDEIS和MRI之间的CD治疗评估并不完全一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号