...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Experomental Medicine >Allosuppressor- and allohelper-T cells in acute and chronic graft-vs.-host (GVH) disease. III. Different Lyt subsets of donor T cells induce different pathological syndromes.
【24h】

Allosuppressor- and allohelper-T cells in acute and chronic graft-vs.-host (GVH) disease. III. Different Lyt subsets of donor T cells induce different pathological syndromes.

机译:急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVH)疾病中的同种异体抑制素和同种异体辅助性T细胞。三,供体T细胞的不同Lyt亚群诱导不同的病理综合征。

获取原文
           

摘要

Previous work from this laboratory has led to the hypothesis that the stimulatory pathological symptoms of chronic graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) are caused by alloreactive donor T helper (TH) cells, whereas the suppressive pathological symptoms of acute GVHD are caused by alloreactive T suppressor (TS) cells of the donor. In the present paper we analyzed the Lyt phenotypes of B10 donor T cells required for the induction of either acute or chronic GVHD in H-2-different (B10 X DBA/2)F1 recipients. First, nonirradiated F1 mice were used as the recipients. We found that unseparated B10 T cells induced only a moderate formation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-like autoantibodies, but a high percentage of lethal GVHD (LGVHD). In contrast, Lyt-1+2- donor T cells were unable to induce LGVHD in these recipients; these cells were capable, however, of inducing a vigorous formation of SLE-like autoantibodies and the formation of severe immune-complex glomerulonephritis. Lyt-1-2+ T cells were incapable of inducing either acute or chronic GVHD. In another experiment, the sensitivity and accuracy of the GVH system were increased by using irradiated F1 mice as recipients and by comparing donor-cell inocula that contained similar numbers of T lymphocytes. In addition, donor-cell inocula were used that had been tested for their allohelper and allosuppressor effects on F1 B cells in vitro. In the irradiated F1 recipients, too, unseparated donor T cells were superior to T cell subsets in inducing LGVHD; Lyt-1-2+ donor cells were completely and Lyt-1+2- donor cells were almost incapable of doing so. In contrast, Lyt-1+2- T cells, but neither unseparated T cells nor Lyt-1-2+ T cells, were capable of inducing a vigorous formation of SLE-like auto-antibodies. We conclude that the stimulatory pathological symptoms of chronic GVHD are caused by Lyt-1+2- allohelper T cells. In contrast, the development of the suppressive pathological symptoms of acute GVHD appears to involve alloreactive Lyt-1+2+ T suppressor cells.
机译:该实验室先前的工作已得出这样的假设:慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的刺激性病理症状是由同种反应性供体T辅助(TH)细胞引起的,而急性GVHD的抑制性病理症状是由供体的同种反应性T抑制(TS)细胞。在本文中,我们分析了在H-2-不同(B10 X DBA / 2)F1受体中诱导急性或慢性GVHD所需的B10供体T细胞的Lyt表型。首先,将未辐照的F1小鼠用作受体。我们发现,未分离的B10 T细胞仅诱导中等程度的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)样自身抗体形成,但致死性GVHD(LGVHD)的比例很高。相反,Lyt-1 + 2-供体T细胞不能在这些受体中诱导LGVHD。然而,这些细胞能够诱导SLE样自身抗体的剧烈形成和严重的免疫复合性肾小球肾炎的形成。 Lyt-1-2 + T细胞无法诱导急性或慢性GVHD。在另一个实验中,通过使用辐照的F1小鼠作为受体并比较包含相似数量T淋巴细胞的供体细胞接种物,可以提高GVH系统的灵敏度和准确性。另外,使用供体细胞接种物,该接种物已在体外对F1 B细胞的同种异体辅助和同种异体抑制作用进行了测试。在辐照的F1受体中,未分离的供体T细胞在诱导LGVHD方面也优于T细胞亚群。 Lyt-1-2 +供体细胞是完全不能的,Lyt-1 + 2-供体细胞几乎不能这样做。相反,Lyt-1 + 2-T细胞,但未分离的T细胞和Lyt-1-2 + T细胞均不能诱导SLE样自身抗体的强烈形成。我们得出结论,慢性GVHD的刺激性病理症状是由Lyt-1 + 2-同种异体辅助性T细胞引起的。相反,急性GVHD抑制性病理症状的发展似乎涉及同种异体反应性Lyt-1 + 2 + T抑制细胞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号