...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery >Mitral valve repair for severe mitral valve regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation
【24h】

Mitral valve repair for severe mitral valve regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation

机译:二尖瓣修复术可在植入左心室辅助设备期间严重二尖瓣关闭不全

获取原文

摘要

BackgroundThe management of severe mitral regurgitation (MR) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is controversial. We adopted an approach of systematic repair of severe MR at the time of LVAD implantation and report our experience.MethodsWe performed mitral valve repair (MVr) on 78 consecutive patients with severe MR undergoing LVAD implantation at our institution between 2013 and 2017. We compared data on these patients to 28 historical controls with severe MR from the immediate preceding period between 2011 and 2013 where the MR was not treated, using Cox modeling and propensity score methods. Median follow-up time was 17.7?months.ResultsPatients who underwent MVr were younger than those who did not (non-MVr group) (55 vs 63?years; P?=?.006), but otherwise had similar preoperative characteristics. The incidence of 30-day mortality (2.6% vs 3.6%; P?=?.78) and other early major adverse events was similar in both groups. At 3?months, no patient in the MVr group had more than mild MR compared with 7 patients (29%) in the non-MVr group (P?P?=?.10). The cumulative incidence of readmission due to congestive heart failure at 2?years was lower in the MVr group than in non-MVr group (7.1% vs 19.7%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.76; P?=?.02).ConclusionsConcurrent MVr at the time of LVAD implantation can be done safely without increase in perioperative adverse events. MVr may be associated with better reduction in severity of MR and may have potential benefit in terms of reduction in readmissions for heart failure.
机译:背景技术左室辅助装置(LVAD)植入时严重二尖瓣关闭不全(MR)的治疗存在争议。我们采用了一种在LVAD植入时对严重MR进行系统性修复的方法,并报告我们的经验。方法我们在2013年至2017年间,对本机构连续78例接受LVAD植入的严重MR的患者进行了二尖瓣修复(MVr)。使用Cox建模和倾向评分方法,对这些患者进行了2011年至2013年之前的28例重度MR的历史对照,这些患者没有接受MR治疗。中位随访时间为17.7个月。结果接受MVr的患者比未接受MVr的患者年轻(非MVr组)(55岁vs 63岁; P?= ?. 006),但术前特征相似。两组的30天死亡率发生率(2.6%比3.6%; P <==。78)和其他早期主要不良事件的发生率相似。在3个月时,MVr组中没有患者的轻度MR高于轻度MR,而非MVr组中的7例(29%)(P

= ?. 10)。 MVr组在2年时因充血性心力衰竭而再次入院的累积发生率低于非MVr组(7.1%比19.7%;调整后的危险比为0.18; 95%置信区间为0.04-0.76; P? = ?. 02)。结论LVAD植入时并发MVr可以安全地完成,而不会增加围手术期的不良事件。 MVr可以更好地降低MR的严重程度,并且在减少心力衰竭的再入院方面可能具有潜在的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号