...
首页> 外文期刊>RSC Advances >Which NICS method is most consistent with ring current analysis? Assessment in simple monocycles
【24h】

Which NICS method is most consistent with ring current analysis? Assessment in simple monocycles

机译:哪种NICS方法与振铃电流分析最一致?简单单轮脚踏车评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aromaticity of benzene, Al _(4) ~(2?) cluster, cyclopropane, borazine and planar cyclooctatetraene (COT) was analyzed according to different strategies based on nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS) computations. The analysis of NICS-components evolution along the main molecular axis seems to be the most adequate and simplest strategy to predict the aromatic or antiaromatic character of the studied systems. Moreover, the analysis of the σ- and π-electron contributions to the out-of-plane component of NICS (NICS _( zz ) ) leads to the same qualitative and quantitative conclusions previously obtained by the analysis of the magnetically induced ring current densities.
机译:基于不依赖核的化学位移(NICS)计算,根据不同策略分析了苯,Al _(4)〜(2?)团簇,环丙烷,硼嗪和平面环辛酸酯(COT)的芳香性。分析NICS沿主分子轴的组分演化似乎是预测所研究系统的芳香或抗芳香特性的最充分,最简单的策略。此外,对NICS的面外分量(NICS _(zz))的σ和π电子贡献的分析得出先前通过磁感应环电流密度分析得出的相同定性和定量结论。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号