...
首页> 外文期刊>Kidney international. >Serum fructosamine versus glycosylated hemoglobin as an index of glycemic control, hospitalization, and infection in diabetic hemodialysis patients
【24h】

Serum fructosamine versus glycosylated hemoglobin as an index of glycemic control, hospitalization, and infection in diabetic hemodialysis patients

机译:血清果糖胺与糖基化血红蛋白的关系作为糖尿病血液透析患者血糖控制,住院和感染的指标

获取原文

摘要

Diabetes is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease and an important risk factor for morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Glycemic control, utilizing serial measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), is generally recommended to limit end-organ damage, including cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We, along with others, have previously suggested that HbA1c may not be a reliable measure of glycemic control in dialysis patients, and have therefore explored the use of serum fructosamine (SF) as an alternative marker. The objective of this study was to compare HbA1c levels with SF in monitoring glycemic control and associated morbidity (infection and hospitalization) in diabetic patients in a large urban hemodialysis (HD) center. We enrolled 100 diabetic HD patients and followed them up prospectively for 3 years. Data on demographics, as well as biochemical and clinical data, including hospitalizations and infections, were recorded. The mean age was 63 years. In all 54% were women and the majority were African Americans (72%). As expected, HbA1c and albumin-corrected fructosamine (AlbF) levels were highly correlated and both were significantly associated with serum glucose. AlbF, however, was more highly correlated with mean glucose values when less than 150 mg/dl and was a more useful predictor of morbidity. By univariate logistic regression and by Poisson regression analysis, AlbF, but not HbA1c, was a significant predictor of hospitalization. Additionally, in patients dialyzed by arteriovenous (AV) access (that is, excluding those dialyzed via vascular catheters), AlbF, but not HbA1c, was a significant predictor of infection. In conclusion, AlbF is as reliable a marker as HbA1c for glycemic control in diabetic patients on HD, and may be advantageous for patients with serum glucose in a desirable therapeutic range (<150 mg/dl). In addition, AlbF, but not HbA1c, is associated with morbidity (hospitalizations and infections) in diabetic patients on HD.
机译:糖尿病是终末期肾脏疾病的最常见原因,并且是透析患者发病和死亡的重要危险因素。通常建议通过对糖基化血红蛋白(HbA1c)进行连续测量来控制血糖,以限制终末器官损害,包括心血管疾病的发病率和死亡率。我们以及其他人以前曾暗示,HbA1c可能不是透析患者血糖控制的可靠方法,因此,我们探索了使用血清果糖胺(SF)作为替代标记。这项研究的目的是在大型城市血液透析(HD)中心比较HbA1c水平与SF在监测糖尿病患者的血糖控制和相关发病率(感染和住院)方面。我们招募了100名糖尿病高清患者,并对他们进行了为期3年的随访。记录了人口统计数据以及包括住院和感染在内的生化和临床数据。平均年龄为63岁。在所有54%的女性中,大多数为非裔美国人(72%)。正如预期的那样,HbA1c和白蛋白校正的果糖胺(AlbF)水平高度相关,并且两者均与血清葡萄糖显着相关。但是,当AlbF低于150 mg / dl时,与平均葡萄糖值的相关性更高,并且是发病率的更有用的预测指标。通过单因素逻辑回归和泊松回归分析,AlbF(而非HbA1c)是住院的重要预测指标。此外,在动静脉(AV)通道透析的患者(即不包括通过血管导管透析的患者)中,AlbF而非HbA1c是感染的重要预测指标。总之,对于HD糖尿病患者的血糖控制,AlbF是与HbA1c一样可靠的标记物,对于血清葡萄糖在理想治疗范围内(<150 mg / dl)的患者可能是有利的。此外,HD糖尿病患者的AlbF而非HbA1c与发病率(医院住院和感染)有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号