...
首页> 外文期刊>Kidney international. >Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients
【24h】

Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients

机译:PTH测量中的方法间差异:对CKD患者的护理意义

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines recommend to maintain the serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration between 150 and 300ng/l in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients. As these limits were derived from studies that used the Allegro intact PTH assay, we aimed to evaluate whether they were applicable to other PTH assays. We compared the PTH concentrations measured with 15 commercial immunoassays in 47 serum pools from dialysis patients, using the Allegro intact PTH assay as the reference. We also evaluated the recovery of graded amounts of synthetic 1–84 and 7–84 PTH added separately to a serum pool. Although the assays were highly correlated, the concentrations differed from one assay to another. The median bias between the tested assays and the Allegro intact PTH assay ranged from -44.9 to 123.0%. When the PTH concentrations were 150 or 300ng/l with the Allegro intact PTH assay, they ranged with other assays from 83 to 323ng/l and from 160 to 638ng/l, respectively. The tested assays recognized 7–84 PTH with various cross-reactivities, whereas a given amount of 1–84 PTH was recovered differently by these assays. We found important inter-method variability in PTH results owing to both antibody specificity and standardization reasons. The unacceptable consequence is that opposite therapeutic attitudes may be reached in a single patient depending on the PTH assay used. We propose to use assay-specific decision limits for CKD patients, or to apply a correcting factor to the PTH results obtained with a given assay.
机译:美国国家肾脏基金会/肾脏透析结果质量倡议指南建议将慢性肾脏病(CKD)5期患者的血清完整甲状旁腺激素(PTH)浓度维持在150至300ng / l之间。由于这些限制来自使用Allegro完整PTH检测的研究,因此我们旨在评估它们是否适用于其他PTH检测。我们以Allegro完整PTH检测为参考,比较了47种来自透析患者的血清中用15种商业免疫测定测得的PTH浓度。我们还评估了分别添加到血清库中的分级1–84和7–84 PTH合成量的回收率。尽管这些测定高度相关,但每种测定的浓度不同。测试的检测与Allegro完整PTH检测之间的中位偏差为-44.9至123.0%。当使用Allegro完整PTH测定法测定PTH浓度为150或300ng / l时,其他测定法测定的PTH浓度范围分别为83-323ng / l和160-638ng / l。经测试的测定法可识别具有多种交叉反应性的7–84 PTH,而这些测定法可回收不同量的1–84 PTH。由于抗体特异性和标准化原因,我们在PTH结果中发现了重要的方法间差异。令人无法接受的结果是,根据所用的PTH分析,单个患者可能会达到相反的治疗态度。我们建议对CKD患者使用特定于测定的决策限度,或将校正因子应用于通过给定测定获得的PTH结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号