首页> 外文期刊>MATEC Web of Conferences >Comparing Road User Charging Acceptability in the City of Tunis and Damascus
【24h】

Comparing Road User Charging Acceptability in the City of Tunis and Damascus

机译:突尼斯和大马士革市道路使用者收费的接受度比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Worldwide, multiple studies have been trying to reduce traffic issues without physically changing the road network, this is when the congestion fees strategy has been considered as a favorable solution for the urban traffic issues. A fundamental condition that needs to be checked before the implementation of the road-pricing scheme is the acceptability of both the political and the public parties. The acceptability is so variable and depends on many features and differs from one individual to another, thus, a survey with a set of variant questions might help to understand the expectations and the worries of the citizens and aim to improve them for better effectiveness of the road-pricing project. This report aims, through analyzing the responses of a distributed survey, to evaluate the acceptability of the citizens of Tunis, Tunisia and Damascus, Syria in order to draw a comparison between the two cities. Moreover, it assesses the degree of acceptability and the variable expectations of the implementation of the congestion fees of the two societies.
机译:在世界范围内,已有多项研究试图在不实际改变道路网络的情况下减少交通问题,这是当拥堵费策略被认为是解决城市交通问题的有利方法时。在实施道路定价方案之前需要检查的一个基本条件是政党和公共团体的可接受性。可接受性是如此多变,取决于许多特征,并且因人而异,因此,通过一系列不同的问题进行的调查可能有助于理解市民的期望和担忧,并旨在改善他们的期望,从而更好地发挥公民的作用。道路定价项目。本报告旨在通过分析分布式调查的答复,评估突尼斯突尼斯和叙利亚大马士革的公民的可接受性,以便对这两个城市进行比较。此外,它评估了两个社会对拥堵费实施的接受程度和不同的期望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号