...
首页> 外文期刊>MATEC Web of Conferences >Using the Grey-TOPSIS Method to Assess the Functioning of the Occupational Risk Management
【24h】

Using the Grey-TOPSIS Method to Assess the Functioning of the Occupational Risk Management

机译:使用Grey-TOPSIS方法评估职业风险管理的功能

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objective of this paper is to analyse the possibility to use the Grey-TOPSIS method to assess the occupational risk management (ORM), in the situation whereby linguistic variables were used in the assessment process. The TOPSIS method has already been in use for a number of years to assess alternative solutions in many areas other than the work safety area. This paper remedies some shortcomings in using the Grey Systems Theory (GST) in ORM, and constitutes an original application of Grey-TOPSIS in the work safety area. Considering that assessment of the ORM process involves estimation of performance particular components of this process, the eight sub-processes were adopted for assessment purposes. The degree of fulfilment of a given sub-processes was assigned a respective verbal grade from Completely Wrong to Perfect. In performing this assessment, systems being in place in four furniture-manufacturing companies were selected to minimise impacts of external factors upon the ORM in these companies. By using the Grey-TOPSIS method, it was possible to rank these companies from the point of view of functioning of the ORM process, and to identify the best and the weakest company in this respect. Further research work should be conducted with the aim to develop some new hybrid, multi-criterion assessment methods, which will develop within the frameworks of the GST.
机译:本文的目的是分析在评估过程中使用语言变量的情况下使用Grey-TOPSIS方法评估职业风险管理(ORM)的可能性。 TOPSIS方法已经使用了很多年,以评估除工作安全领域以外的许多领域的替代解决方案。本文弥补了在ORM中使用灰色系统理论(GST)的一些缺陷,并构成了Grey-TOPSIS在工作安全领域的原始应用。考虑到对ORM流程的评估涉及对该流程特定绩效的评估,因此采用了八个子流程进行评估。给定子过程的完成程度被指定为从完全错误到完美的相应语言等级。在执行此评估时,选择了四个家具制造公司中使用的系统,以最大程度地减少外部因素对这些公司中ORM的影响。通过使用Grey-TOPSIS方法,可以从ORM流程的运作角度对这些公司进行排名,并在这方面确定最佳和最弱的公司。应该开展进一步的研究工作,以期开发一些新的混合,多标准评估方法,这些方法将在商品及服务税的框架内发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号