首页> 外文期刊>MATEC Web of Conferences >Efficiency Comparison between Conventional and Modern Port Operation System for Small-Scale Dry Bulk Cargo
【24h】

Efficiency Comparison between Conventional and Modern Port Operation System for Small-Scale Dry Bulk Cargo

机译:小型干散货传统与现代港口作业系统效率比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Since the launching of Sea Toll Road Program in 2015, the improvement in ports’ operation systems has become Indonesia’s foremost necessity. This improvement commonly leads to equipment modernization, while realistically, modern equipment does not always amount to a productive performance, especially in the context of small-scale ports. Instead, it is prone to creating wasteful capital and maintenance cost as well as making the planning time ineffective. This study compares two options of port operation systems in a small port, which is conventional and technologically-advanced method for dry bulk cargo. It results in thin gaps between each option’s financial assessment variables, which are Internal Rate of Return, Benefit/Cost Ratio and Payback Period, regardless of a stark difference between each option’s equipment cost. This study concludes that with the right approach, the conventional operation system is still the most efficient option compared to its contemporary opposite.
机译:自2015年启动“海上收费公路计划”以来,改善港口运营系统已成为印度尼西亚的首要需求。这种改进通常会导致设备现代化,而实际上,现代设备并不一定总能带来生产性能,特别是在小规模港口的情况下。相反,它容易造成浪费的资金和维护成本,并使计划时间无效。这项研究比较了小港口港口操作系统的两种选择,这是干散货的传统方法和技术先进方法。不管每个选项的设备成本之间有何显着差异,这都会导致每个选项的财务评估变量之间的差距很小,这些变量是内部收益率,收益/成本比和投资回收期。这项研究得出的结论是,采用正确的方法,与现代系统相比,常规操作系统仍然是最有效的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号