...
首页> 外文期刊>MATEC Web of Conferences >Hydraulic Analysis of Biochannels for Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems
【24h】

Hydraulic Analysis of Biochannels for Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems

机译:可持续城市排水系统生物通道的水力分析

获取原文
           

摘要

This study focuses on employing channel lining materials that includes Turf Reinforcements Mat (TRM) and Erosion Control Blanket (ECB) as bioengineering techniques for erosion control. Hydraulic characteristics of flow through these materials were determined in terms of flow velocities and shear stresses. The experimental results indicated that the average velocity for TRM ranges between 0.6 to 3.5 m/s, while that of ECB varies from 0.7 to 4.1 m/s. Also, TRM has shear stress values of 1.950 N/m3 for bed and 1.575 N/m3 for bank respectively of test channel when the flow depth was 15cm. While ECB has shear stresses of 2.138 N/m3 for bed and 1.721 N/m3 for bank for same flow depth of 15cm. However, when the flow depth is 5 cm, TRM has values of 0.972 N/m3 for bed and 0.769 N/m3 for bank, and ECB gives 0.957 N/m3 for bed and 0.766 N/m3 for bank of test channel. Hence, the greater the flow depth, the higher the velocities and shear stresses respectively. Conversely, lower flow depths lead to velocities and shear stresses that are within the allowable standards for designing a stable channel. Generally, TRM performed the best for having higher shear stresses compared to ECB.
机译:这项研究的重点是采用包括草皮增强垫(TRM)和侵蚀控制毯(ECB)在内的渠道衬砌材料作为生物工程技术来进行侵蚀控制。通过这些材料的流动的水力特性是根据流速和剪切应力确定的。实验结果表明,TRM的平均速度介于0.6至3.5 m / s之间,而ECB的平均速度介于0.7至4.1 m / s之间。同样,当流动深度为15cm时,TRM的测试通道床的剪切应力值为1.950 N / m3,堤岸的剪切应力值为1.575 N / m3。对于15cm的相同流动深度,ECB床的剪应力为2.138 N / m3,堤岸的剪应力为1.721 N / m3。但是,当流动深度为5 cm时,TRM的床床值为0.972 N / m3,河床的河床值为0.769 N / m3,而ECB的河床床为0.957 N / m3,测试河床的河床值为0.766 N / m3。因此,流动深度越大,速度和剪切应力分别越高。相反,较低的流动深度会导致速度和剪切应力在设计稳定通道的允许标准之内。通常,与ECB相比,TRM表现出最好的剪切应力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号