首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Motivational Reasons for Biased Decisions: The Sunk-Cost Effecta??s Instrumental Rationality
【24h】

Motivational Reasons for Biased Decisions: The Sunk-Cost Effecta??s Instrumental Rationality

机译:偏差决策的动机原因:沉没成本效应的工具理性

获取原文
       

摘要

The present study describes the mechanism of need regulation, which accompanies the so-called “biased” decisions. We hypothesized an unconscious urge for psychological need satisfaction as the trigger for cognitive biases. In an experimental study (N = 106), participants had the opportunity to win money in a functionality test. In the test, they could either use the solution they had developed (sunk cost) or an alternative solution that offered a higher probability of winning. The selection of the sunk-cost option (SCO) was the most chosen option, supporting the hypothesis of this study. The reason behind the majority of participants choosing the SCO seemed to be the satisfaction of psychological needs, despite a reduced chance of winning money. An intervention, which aimed at triggering self-reflection, had no impact on the decision. The findings of this study contribute to the discussion on the reasons for cognitive biases and their formation in the human mind. Moreover, it discusses the application of the label “irrational” for biased decisions and proposes reasons for instrumental rationality, which exist at an unconscious, need-regulative level.
机译:本研究描述了需求调节的机制,它伴随着所谓的“偏见”决策。我们假设无意识的对心理需求满足的渴望是认知偏见的触发因素。在一项实验研究(N = 106)中,参与者有机会在功能测试中赢钱。在测试中,他们可以使用自己开发的解决方案(降低成本),也可以使用其他解决方案来提高获胜的可能性。选择沉没成本期权(SCO)是最常用的方案,支持本研究的假设。尽管赢得金钱的机会减少了,但大多数参与者选择SCO的原因似乎是满足了心理需求。旨在引发自我反省的干预措施对该决定没有影响。这项研究的结果有助于讨论认知偏差的原因及其在人脑中的形成。此外,它讨论了标签“非理性”在有偏见的决策中的应用,并提出了工具理性的理由,这些理由存在于无意识,需求调节的水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号