...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Academic Goal Profiles and Learning Strategies in Adolescence
【24h】

Academic Goal Profiles and Learning Strategies in Adolescence

机译:青春期的学术目标简介和学习策略

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objective of this study was to verify whether or not a combination of academic goals may be established in different profiles of high school students. Subsequently, the study examined if statistically significant differences exist between the profiles obtained with respect to learning strategies used by the students. The Achievement Goal Tendencies Questionnaire (AGTQ) and the Learning and Studies Skills Inventory-High School Version (LASSI-HS) were administered to a sample of 2,069 high school students aged 12–16 (M = 14.11; SD = 1.35) and which was formed by 1,073 girls and 996 boys. Four academic goal profiles were identified using latent class analysis: a group of students with a high academic goal (HAG) profile (668 students), a group of students with a low academic goal (LAG) profile (502 students), a group of students with a predominance of learning goals and achievement goals (LGAG) (489 students) and a final group of students with a predominance of social reinforcement goals and achievement goals (410 students). The results revealed statistically significant differences between the profiles obtained with respect to learning strategies because students from the combined LGAG and HAG profiles used more learning strategies that those in the LAG and Achievement Goals and Social Reinforcement (AGSR)groups. However, the relationship between these motivational profiles and the obtainment of a higher academic performance has not been proven and it should be the subject of study in future research. Consequently, this study can be used to help in the development of strategies and intervention programs to promote the use of multiple academic goals in high school students.
机译:这项研究的目的是验证是否可以在不同的高中生中建立学术目标的组合。随后,该研究检查了就学生使用的学习策略而言,配置文件之间是否存在统计学上的显着差异。对2 069名12-16岁的中学生(M = 14.11; SD = 1.35)进行了“成就目标倾向调查表”(AGTQ)和“学习和学习技能库存-高中”版本(LAS = HS)。由1,073名女孩和996名男孩组成。使用潜在类别分析确定了四个学术目标资料:一组具有较高学术目标(HAG)资料的学生(668名学生),一组具有较低学术目标(LAG)资料的学生(502名学生),一组主要学习目标和成就目标(LGAG)的学生(489名学生),最后一组具有社会强化目标和成就目标的学生(410名学生)。结果显示,就学习策略而言,配置文件之间存在统计学上的显着差异,因为来自LGAG和HAG组合的学生使用的学习策略要比LAG和成就目标与社会强化(AGSR)组的学习策略更多。然而,这些动机与获得较高学业​​成绩之间的关系尚未得到证明,应该成为未来研究的主题。因此,该研究可用于帮助制定策略和干预计划,以促进高中生使用多种学术目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号