...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Using Motivational Interviewing to reduce threats in conversations about environmental behavior
【24h】

Using Motivational Interviewing to reduce threats in conversations about environmental behavior

机译:使用动机访谈减少有关环境行为的对话中的威胁

获取原文

摘要

Human behavior contributes to a waste of environmental resources and our society is looking for ways to reduce this problem. However, humans may perceive feedback about their environmental behavior as threatening. According to self-determination theory (SDT), threats decrease intrinsic motivation for behavior change. According to self-affirmation theory (SAT), threats can harm individuals’ self-integrity. Therefore, individuals should show self-defensive biases, e.g., in terms of presenting counter-arguments when presented with environmental behavior change. The current study examines how change recipients respond to threats from change agents in interactions about environmental behavior change. Moreover, we investigate how Motivational Interviewing (MI) — an intervention aimed at increasing intrinsic motivation — can reduce threats at both the social and cognitive level. We videotaped 68 dyadic interactions with change agents who either did or did not use MI (control group). We coded agents verbal threats and recipients’ verbal expressions of motivation. Recipients also rated agents’ level of confrontation and empathy (i.e., cognitive reactions). As hypothesized, threats were significantly lower when change agents used MI. Perceived confrontations converged with observable social behavior of change agents in both groups. Moreover, behavioral threats showed a negative association with change recipients’ expressed motivation (i.e., reasons to change). Contrary to our expectations, we found no relation between change agents’ verbal threats and change recipients’ verbally expressed self-defenses (i.e., sustain talk). Our results imply that MI reduces the adverse impact of threats in conversations about environmental behavior change on both the social and cognitive level. We discuss theoretical implications of our study in the context of SAT and SDT and suggest practical implications for environmental change agents in organizations.
机译:人类的行为造成环境资源的浪费,我们的社会正在寻找减少这种问题的方法。但是,人类可能会将有关其环境行为的反馈视为威胁。根据自决理论(SDT),威胁降低了行为改变的内在动机。根据自我肯定理论(SAT),威胁会损害个人的自我完整性。因此,个人应表现出自我防御的偏见,例如在表现出环境行为变化时表现出反辩。当前的研究检验了变革接受者如何在与环境行为变化的互动中响应变革主体的威胁。此外,我们研究了动机面试(MI)(旨在增加内在动机的干预措施)如何减少社交和认知层面的威胁。我们对与使用或未使用MI的变革推动者进行了68次双向互动的录像(对照组)。我们对特工的言语威胁和收件人的言语动机进行编码。收件人还对特工的对抗和同情(即认知反应)水平进行了评估。如假设的那样,当变革推动者使用MI时,威胁显着降低。在两组中,感知到的对抗与变革推动者的可观察社会行为融合在一起。此外,行为威胁显示出与变更接受者表达的动机(即变更原因)之间存在负相关关系。与我们的预期相反,我们发现变更代理人的口头威胁与变更接收者的口头表达的自卫(即维持谈话)之间没有任何关系。我们的结果表明,MI在社会和认知层面上都减少了有关环境行为变化的对话中威胁的不利影响。我们在SAT和SDT的背景下讨论了我们研究的理论意义,并提出了对组织中的环境变化主体的实际意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号