...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Relationships between Motor and Executive Functions and the Effect of an Acute Coordinative Intervention on Executive Functions in Kindergartners
【24h】

Relationships between Motor and Executive Functions and the Effect of an Acute Coordinative Intervention on Executive Functions in Kindergartners

机译:运动与执行功能之间的关系以及急性协调干预对幼儿园执行功能的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

There is growing evidence indicating positive, causal effects of acute physical activity on cognitive performance of school children, adolescents, and adults. However, only a few studies examined these effects in kindergartners, even though correlational studies suggest moderate relationships between motor and cognitive functions in this age group. One aim of the present study was to examine the correlational relationships between motor and executive functions among 5- to 6-year-olds. Another aim was to test whether an acute coordinative intervention, which was adapted to the individual motor functions of the children, causally affected different executive functions (i.e., motor inhibition, cognitive inhibition, and shifting). Kindergartners (N = 102) were randomly assigned either to a coordinative intervention (20 min) or to a control condition (20 min). The coordination group performed five bimanual exercises (e.g., throwing/kicking balls onto targets with the right and left hand/foot), whereas the control group took part in five simple activities that hardly involved coordination skills (e.g., stamping). Children’s motor functions were assessed with the Movement Assessment Battery for Children 2 (Petermann, 2009) in a pre-test (T1), 1 week before the intervention took place. Motor inhibition was assessed with the Simon says task (Carlson and Wang, 2007), inhibition and shifting were assessed with the Hearts and Flowers task (Davidson et al., 2006) in the pre-test and again in a post-test (T2) immediately after the interventions. Results revealed significant correlations between motor functions and executive functions (especially shifting) at T1. There was no overall effect of the intervention. However, explorative analyses indicated a three-way interaction, with the intervention leading to accuracy gains only in the motor inhibition task and only if it was tested directly after the intervention. As an unexpected effect, this result needs to be treated with caution but may indicate that the effect of acute coordinative exercise is temporally limited and emerges only for motor inhibition, but not for cognitive inhibition or shifting. More generally, in contrast to other studies including older participants and endurance exercises, no general effect of an acute coordinative intervention on executive functions was revealed for kindergartners.
机译:越来越多的证据表明,急性体育锻炼对学童,青少年和成人的认知表现有积极的因果关系。但是,尽管相关研究表明该年龄段的运动和认知功能之间存在中等关系,但只有少数研究检查了幼儿园的这些影响。本研究的目的之一是检查5至6岁儿童的运动功能与执行功能之间的相关关系。另一个目的是测试适应于儿童个别运动功能的急性协调干预是否因果影响不同的执行功能(即运动抑制,认知抑制和转移)。将幼稚园(N = 102)随机分配给协调干预(20分钟)或对照条件(20分钟)。协调小组进行了五次双手练习(例如,用左右手/脚向目标投掷/踢球),而对照组则参加了五项几乎不涉及协调技能的简单活动(例如,踩踏)。在进行干预前1周,通过“儿童运动评估电池2”(Petermann,2009年)在预测试(T1)中对儿童的运动功能进行了评估。运动抑制作用由西蒙说任务(Carlson and Wang,2007)进行评估,抑制和转移是由Hearts and Flowers任务(Davidson et al。,2006)进行的,在测试前和测试后进行。 )。结果显示,在T1时,运动功能与执行功能(尤其是移位)之间存在显着相关性。干预没有整体效果。但是,探索性分析表明这是一种三向交互作用,干预仅在运动抑制任务中并且仅在干预后直接进行测试时才能导致准确性的提高。作为一种意想不到的效果,需要谨慎对待此结果,但可能表明,急性协调运动的效果在时间上受到限制,并且仅在运动抑制方面出现,而在认知抑制或转变方面没有出现。更普遍的是,与其他研究(包括较年长的参与者和耐力运动)相反,对于幼儿园,没有发现急性协调干预对执行功能的一般影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号