首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Using Hierarchical Linear Models to Examine Approximate Number System Acuity: The Role of Trial-Level and Participant-Level Characteristics
【24h】

Using Hierarchical Linear Models to Examine Approximate Number System Acuity: The Role of Trial-Level and Participant-Level Characteristics

机译:使用分层线性模型检查近似数字系统敏锐度:试验级和参与者级特征的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

The ability to intuitively and quickly compare the number of items in collections without counting is thought to rely on the Approximate Number System (ANS). To assess individual differences in the precision of peoples’ ANS representations, researchers often use non-symbolic number comparison tasks in which participants quickly choose the numerically larger of two arrays of dots. However, some researchers debate whether this task actually measures the ability to discriminate approximate numbers or instead measures the ability to discriminate other continuous magnitude dimensions that are often confounded with number (e.g., the total surface area of the dots or the convex hull of the dot arrays). In this study, we used hierarchical linear models (HLMs) to predict 132 adults’ accuracy on each trial of a non-symbolic number comparison task from a comprehensive set of trial-level characteristics (including numerosity ratio, surface area, convex hull, and temporal and spatial variations in presentation format) and participant-level controls (including cognitive abilities such as visual-short term memory, working memory, and math ability) in order to gain a more nuanced understanding of how individuals complete this task. Our results indicate that certain trial-level characteristics of the dot arrays contribute to our ability to compare numerosities, yet numerosity ratio, the critical marker of the ANS, remains a highly significant predictor of accuracy above and beyond trial-level characteristics and across individuals with varying levels of math ability and domain-general cognitive abilities.
机译:直观而快速地比较集合中项目数量而不进行计数的能力被认为依赖于近似数字系统(ANS)。为了评估人们在ANS表示的精确度方面的个体差异,研究人员经常使用非符号数字比较任务,其中参与者可以快速选择两个点阵的数值较大的点。但是,一些研究人员争论此任务是否实际上是测量辨别近似数字的能力还是测量辨别通常与数字混淆的其他连续量纲尺寸的能力(例如,点的总表面积或点的凸包)数组)。在这项研究中,我们使用分层线性模型(HLM),从一组综合的试验水平特征(包括数量比,表面积,凸包和演示格式的时空变化)和参与者级别的控件(包括视觉短期记忆,工作记忆和数学能力等认知能力),以便对个人如何完成此任务有更细致的了解。我们的结果表明,点阵的某些试验级特征有助于我们比较分子质量,但是,空位比(ANS的关键标志)仍然是高于或超过试验级特征以及个体之间准确性的重要预测指标。数学能力和领域通用认知能力的水平有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号