首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Prosocial Personality Traits Differentially Predict Egalitarianism, Generosity, and Reciprocity in Economic Games
【24h】

Prosocial Personality Traits Differentially Predict Egalitarianism, Generosity, and Reciprocity in Economic Games

机译:亲社会人格特征差异预测经济游戏中的平均主义,慷慨和互惠

获取原文
           

摘要

Recent research has highlighted the role of prosocial personality traits—agreeableness and honesty-humility—in egalitarian distributions of wealth in the dictator game. Expanding on these findings, we ran two studies to examine individual differences in two other forms of prosociality—generosity and reciprocity—with respect to two major models of personality, the Big Five and the HEXACO. Participants (combined N = 560) completed a series of economic games in which allocations in the dictator game were compared with those in the generosity game, a non-constant-sum wealth distribution task where proposers with fixed payoffs selected the size of their partner’s payoff (“generosity”). We further examined positive and negative reciprocity by manipulating a partner’s previous move (“reciprocity”). Results showed clear evidence of both generosity and positive reciprocity in social preferences, with allocations to a partner greater in the generosity game than in the dictator game, and greater still when a player had been previously assisted by their partner. There was also a consistent interaction with gender, whereby men were more generous when this was costless and women were more egalitarian overall. Furthermore, these distinct forms of prosociality were differentially predicted by personality traits, in line with the core features of these traits and the theoretical distinctions between them. HEXACO honesty-humility predicted dictator, but not generosity allocations, while traits capturing tendencies toward irritability and anger predicted lower generosity, but not dictator allocations. In contrast, the politeness—but not compassion—aspect of Big Five agreeableness was uniquely and broadly associated with prosociality across all games. These findings support the discriminant validity between related prosocial constructs, and have important implications for understanding the motives and mechanisms taking place within economic games.
机译:最近的研究突出了亲社会人格特质-令人愉快和诚实-谦卑-在独裁者博弈中财富的平均分配中的作用。在这些发现的基础上,我们进行了两项研究,以考察两种主要的人格模型-“大五人”和“十六进制”-在两种其他形式的亲社会上的个体差异-慷慨和互惠。参与者(合并N = 560)完成了一系列经济博弈,将独裁者博弈中的分配与慷慨博弈中的分配进行了比较,慷慨博弈是一种非固定金额的财富分配任务,其中具有固定收益的提议者选择了其伙伴收益的大小(“慷慨”)。我们通过操纵伙伴的先前举动(“互惠”)进一步检查了正反互惠。结果显示出社交偏好上慷慨大方和积极互惠的明确证据,在慷慨博弈中,对伴侣的分配要比在独裁者博弈中更大,而在以前由伴侣提供帮助的情况下,对伴侣的分配也更大。与性别之间也存在着一贯的互动,在这种情况下,无成本的男人更慷慨,而女性总体上更平等。此外,根据人格特质的核心特征和它们之间的理论差异,人格特质对这些独特的亲社会形式进行了不同的预测。 HEXACO诚实谦卑可预测独裁者,但不能慷慨地分配,而捕捉易怒和愤怒倾向的特征则预测较低的慷慨,而非独裁者的分配。相反,在所有五项游戏中,礼貌而不是同情心在“五巨头”方面都具有独特而广泛的联系。这些发现支持相关亲社会建构之间的判别有效性,并且对于理解经济博弈中发生的动机和机制具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号