...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Cognitive Load Does Not Affect the Behavioral and Cognitive Foundations of Social Cooperation
【24h】

Cognitive Load Does Not Affect the Behavioral and Cognitive Foundations of Social Cooperation

机译:认知负荷不会影响社会合作的行为和认知基础

获取原文
           

摘要

The present study serves to test whether the cognitive mechanisms underlying social cooperation are affected by cognitive load. Participants interacted with trustworthy-looking and untrustworthy-looking partners in a sequential Prisoner’s Dilemma Game. Facial trustworthiness was manipulated to stimulate expectations about the future behavior of the partners which were either violated or confirmed by the partners’ cheating or cooperation during the game. In a source memory test, participants were required to recognize the partners and to classify them as cheaters or cooperators. A multinomial model was used to disentangle item memory, source memory and guessing processes. We found an expectancy-congruent bias toward guessing that trustworthy-looking partners were more likely to be associated with cooperation than untrustworthy-looking partners. Source memory was enhanced for cheating that violated the participants’ positive expectations about trustworthy-looking partners. We were interested in whether or not this expectancy-violation effect—that helps to revise unjustified expectations about trustworthy-looking partners—depends on cognitive load induced via a secondary continuous reaction time task. Although this secondary task interfered with working memory processes in a validation study, both the expectancy-congruent guessing bias as well as the expectancy-violation effect were obtained with and without cognitive load. These findings support the hypothesis that the expectancy-violation effect is due to a simple mechanism that does not rely on demanding elaborative processes. We conclude that most cognitive mechanisms underlying social cooperation presumably operate automatically so that they remain unaffected by cognitive load.
机译:本研究旨在检验社会合作背后的认知机制是否受到认知负荷的影响。在连续的《囚徒困境游戏》中,参与者与看上去值得信赖和看上去不值得信赖的合作伙伴进行了互动。操纵面部信任度来激发人们对合作伙伴未来行为的期望,这些期望在游戏过程中被合作伙伴的作弊行为或合作行为破坏或证实。在源记忆测试中,要求参与者识别合作伙伴并将其分类为作弊者或合作者。使用多项式模型来分解项目存储,源存储和猜测过程。我们发现,期望值相符的偏见在于,猜测看起来值得信赖的合作伙伴比看起来不值得信赖的合作伙伴更可能与合作相关。欺骗者违反了参与者对可信赖伙伴的积极期望,从而增强了源记忆。我们对这种违反预期的效果(有助于修改对值得信赖的伙伴的不合理的期望)是否依赖于次要连续反应时间任务所引起的认知负荷感兴趣。尽管此次要任务干扰了一项验证研究中的工作记忆过程,但在有或没有认知负荷的情况下,均能获得预期一致的猜测偏见以及预期违反行为。这些发现支持以下假设:预期违约效应是由于不依赖于苛刻的详细过程的简单机制引起的。我们得出的结论是,社会合作背后的大多数认知机制大概都是自动运行的,因此它们不会受到认知负荷的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号