...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Editorial: Quantum Structures in Cognitive and Social Science
【24h】

Editorial: Quantum Structures in Cognitive and Social Science

机译:社论:认知和社会科学中的量子结构

获取原文
           

摘要

A fundamental problem in cognitive and social science concerns the identification of the principles guiding human cognitive acts such as decision-making, categorization, and behavior under uncertainty. Identifying these mechanisms would have manifold implications for fields ranging from psychology to economics, finance, politics, computer science, and artificial intelligence. The predominant theoretical paradigm rests on a classical conception of logic and probability theory. According to this paradigm people make decisions by following the rules of Boole's logic, while the probabilistic aspects of these decisions can be formalized by Kolmogorov's probability theory. This classical approach was believed to provide a quite complete and accurate account of human decision-making at both a normative level (describing what people should do) and a descriptive level (describing what people actually do). However, starting from the seventies, experimental studies of conceptual categorization, human judgment and perception, and behavioral economics have revealed that this classical conception is fundamentally problematical, in the sense that the cognitive models based on these mathematical structures are not capable of capturing how humans make decisions in situations involving uncertainty. In the last decade, an alternative scientific paradigm has arisen that employs a different and more general modeling scheme; it uses the mathematical formalism of quantum theory to model situations and processes in cognitive and social science. This new approach has not only met with considerable success but is becoming increasingly accepted in the scientific community, having attracted interest from important scientists, top journals, funding institutions, and media. Prisoners' dilemmas, conjunction and disjunction fallacies, disjunction effects, violations of the Sure-Thing principle, Allais, Ellsberg and Machina paradoxes, are only some of the examples where the application of the quantum mechanical formalism has shown significant effectiveness over traditional modeling schemes of a classical type.
机译:认知和社会科学中的一个基本问题涉及确定指导人类认知行为的原则,例如决策,分类和不确定情况下的行为。识别这些机制将对心理学,经济学,金融,政治,计算机科学和人工智能等领域产生多方面的影响。主要的理论范式基于逻辑和概率论的经典概念。根据这种范式,人们通过遵循布尔的逻辑规则进行决策,而这些决策的概率方面可以通过科尔摩哥罗夫的概率论来形式化。人们认为,这种经典方法可以在规范性级别(描述人们应该做什么)和描述性级别(描述人们实际做什么)上提供关于人类决策的相当完整和准确的说明。但是,从七十年代开始,对概念分类,人类判断和感知以及行为经济学的实验研究表明,从基于这些数学结构的认知模型无法捕获人类的意义上说,这种经典概念从根本上是有问题的在不确定的情况下做出决定。在过去的十年中,出现了一种替代的科学范式,它采用了一种不同且更通用的建模方案。它使用量子理论的数学形式主义对认知和社会科学中的情况和过程进行建模。这种新方法不仅取得了相当大的成功,而且还引起了重要科学家,顶级期刊,资助机构和媒体的关注,在科学界也越来越被接受。囚徒困境,合取和析取谬误,析取效应,违反Sure-Thing原理,Allais,Ellsberg和Machina悖论,只是使用量子力学形式主义已证明优于传统建模方案的某些例子经典类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号