首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold
【24h】

Two Visual Training Paradigms Associated with Enhanced Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold

机译:与增强的临界闪烁融合阈值相关的两个视觉训练范例

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Critical flicker fusion thresholds (CFFTs) describe when quick amplitude modulations of a light source become undetectable as the frequency of the modulation increases and are thought to underlie a number of visual processing skills, including reading. Here, we compare the impact of two vision-training approaches, one involving contrast sensitivity training and the other directional dot-motion training, compared to an active control group trained on Sudoku. The three training paradigms were compared on their effectiveness for altering CFFT. Directional dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training resulted in significant improvement in CFFT, while the Sudoku group did not yield significant improvement. This finding indicates that dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training similarly transfer to effect changes in CFFT. The results, combined with prior research linking CFFT to high-order cognitive processes such as reading ability, and studies showing positive impact of both dot-motion and contrast sensitivity training in reading, provide a possible mechanistic link of how these different training approaches impact reading abilities.
机译:关键的闪烁融合阈值(CFFT)描述了随着调制频率的增加,何时无法检测到光源的快速幅度调制,并且这些阈值被认为是许多视觉处理技能(包括阅读)的基础。在这里,我们比较了在Sudoku上训练的一个活动对照组的两种视觉训练方法的影响,一种方法包括对比敏感度训练,另一种是方向性点动作训练。比较了这三种训练范例对改变CFFT的有效性。定向点运动和对比敏感度训练导致CFFT显着改善,而Sudoku组则没有显着改善。这一发现表明,点运动和对比度敏感度训练类似地转换为CFFT中的效果变化。结果与先前将CFFT与诸如阅读能力之类的高阶认知过程相关的研究相结合,并且研究显示点运动和对比敏感度训练对阅读都有积极影响,这些可能提供了一种机制联系,说明这些不同的训练方式如何影响阅读能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号