首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk
【24h】

Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk

机译:在三种不同的执行职能中,一般执行控制能力是客观风险下决策的关键预测指标

获取原文
           

摘要

Executive functioning is supposed to have an important role in decision making under risk. Several studies reported that more advantageous decision-making behavior was accompanied by better performance in tests of executive functioning and that the decision-making process was accompanied by activations in prefrontal and subcortical brain regions associated with executive functioning. However, to what extent different components of executive functions contribute to decision making is still unclear. We tested direct and indirect effects of three executive functions on decision-making performance in a laboratory gambling task, the Game of Dice Task (GDT). Using Brand's model of decisions under risk (2006) we tested seven structural equation models with three latent variables that represent executive functions supposed to be involved in decision making. The latent variables were general control (represented by the general ability to exert attentional and behavioral self-control that is in accordance with task goals despite interfering information), concept formation (represented by categorization, rule detection, and set maintenance), and monitoring (represented by supervision of cognition and behavior). The seven models indicated that only the latent dimension general control had a direct effect on decision making under risk. Concept formation and monitoring only contributed in terms of indirect effects, when mediated by general control. Thus, several components of executive functioning seem to be involved in decision making under risk. However, general control functions seem to have a key role. They may be important for implementing the calculative and cognitively controlled processes involved in advantageous decision making under risk.
机译:执行职能在风险决策中被认为具有重要作用。几项研究报告说,更有利的决策行为伴随着执行功能测试中的更好表现,并且决策过程伴随着与执行功能相关的前额叶和皮层下大脑区域的激活。但是,尚不清楚执行职能的不同组成部分在多大程度上有助于决策。我们在实验室赌博任务“骰子游戏任务(GDT)”中测试了三个执行功能对决策绩效的直接和间接影响。使用布兰德(Brand)的风险决策模型(2006),我们测试了具有三个潜在变量的七个结构方程模型,这些潜在变量表示应该参与决策的执行功能。潜在变量是一般控制(由尽管有干扰信息也能根据任务目标施加注意和行为自我控制的一般能力表示),概念形成(由分类,规则检测和设置维护表示)和监视(以认知和行为的监督为代表)。这七个模型表明,只有潜在维度的一般控制对风险决策具有直接影响。在一般控制的调节下,概念的形成和监测仅在间接作用方面起作用。因此,执行职能的几个组成部分似乎参与了风险决策。但是,一般的控制功能似乎起着关键作用。对于实施风险中有利的决策所涉及的计算和认知控制过程,它们可能很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号