...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Can creative productivity be both positively and negatively correlated with psychopathology? Yes!
【24h】

Can creative productivity be both positively and negatively correlated with psychopathology? Yes!

机译:创造性生产力是否可以与精神病理学呈正相关和负相关?是!

获取原文
           

摘要

Empirical research on the hypothesized relation between creativity and psychopathology must take care to frame the question very carefully. If a person's creativity is defined by the output of creative products, then the empirical association can be either positive or negative, depending on how that association is specified. On the one hand, individuals who make at least one creative contribution to a domain may exhibit lower risk of psychopathology than those who never do. On the other hand, among those individuals who contribute one or more creative products, those who contribute the most creative products may have higher risk of psychopathology than those who contribute the fewest creative products. These two hypotheses can both be empirically confirmed because the cross-sectional distribution of creative output is described by a highly skewed inverse power function known as Lotka's Law (Lotka, 1926). That is, the number of individuals producing n creative products is proportional to 12 (Egghe, 2005). Given this skewed distribution, the risk rate can easily increase as a linear function of creative productivity even though the overall risk rate is strikingly lower than in the general population.
机译:关于创造力和心理病理学之间的假设关系的实证研究必须小心谨慎地提出问题。如果一个人的创造力是由创意产品的输出定义的,那么经验关联可以是正的或负的,具体取决于该关联的指定方式。一方面,对某个领域做出至少一项创造性贡献的个人可能比那些从未做出过贡献的人表现出更低的心理病理风险。另一方面,在提供一个或多个创意产品的个人中,与提供最少创意产品的人相比,提供最多创意产品的人的心理病理风险更高。这两个假设都可以凭经验得到证实,因为创意输出的横截面分布是由高度偏斜的逆幂函数(称为洛特卡定律)描述的(Lotka,1926)。也就是说,生产n种创意产品的个体数量与1 / n2成正比(Egghe,2005年)。在这种偏斜分布的情况下,即使总体风险率显着低于一般人群,风险率仍可以很容易地随创造力的线性关系增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号