首页> 外文期刊>E3S Web of Conferences >Comparative Study on Environmental Benefits of Using low-Sulphur Oil and Shore Power Technology for Ship Berthing
【24h】

Comparative Study on Environmental Benefits of Using low-Sulphur Oil and Shore Power Technology for Ship Berthing

机译:低硫油和岸电技术在船舶停泊中的环境效益比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

In order to compare the environmental benefits of two emission reduction measures, i.e. using low-sulphur oil and shore power technology, this paper takes the ships arriving at Guangzhou port as an example, based on the ship data of entry and departure visa of Guangzhou port in 2015, and uses statistical analysis to determine the relationship between different ship types of diesel engines, ship berthing time and ship deadweight tonnage, and based on the use of low-sulphur oil and berthing using shore power air pollutants emission On the basis of emission factors and diesel engine load, the environmental benefits of the two emission reduction measures are calculated by the calculation model established by the dynamic method. The results show that:(1) in 2015, when ships berthing in Guangzhou port used low-sulphur oil with sulphur content of 0.5%, PM10, NOx, SOx and CO2 decreased by 231.6t, 165.5t, 2039.3t and 0t respectively, when using low-sulphur oil with sulphur content of 0.1%, PM_(10), NO_(X), SO_(x)and CO_(2)decreased by 244.1t, 517.1t, 2382.7t and 0t respectively. when ships berthing in Guangzhou port used shore power, PM, NO_(x), SO_(x)and CO_(2)decreased by 283.8t, 2975.6t, 2407.7t and - 3782.2t respectively. (2) compared with the use of low sulphur oil, the use of shore power by berthing ships has a significant advantage in NOx emission reduction. In terms of particulate matter, SO_(X)and CO_(2)emission reduction, there is no significant difference between the two measures.
机译:为了比较低硫油和岸电技术这两种减排措施的环境效益,以广州港出入境签证的船舶数据为例,以到达广州港的船舶为例。在2015年,并使用统计分析确定了不同船型的柴油发动机,船舶停泊时间和船舶自重吨位之间的关系,并基于低硫油的使用和靠岸电力空气污染物的靠泊排放排放的基础上因子和柴油机负荷,通过动态方法建立的计算模型计算出两种减排措施的环境效益。结果表明:(1)2015年,广州港靠泊的船舶使用硫含量为0.5%的低硫油时,PM10,NOx,SOx和CO2分别减少了231.6t,165.5t,2039.3t和0t,当使用硫含量为0.1%的低硫油时,PM_(10),NO_(X),SO_(x)和CO_(2)分别降低了244.1t,517.1t,2382.7t和0t。当广州港停泊的船舶使用岸电时,PM,NO_(x),SO_(x)和CO_(2)分别减少了283.8t,2975.6t,2407.7t和-3782.2t。 (2)与使用低硫油相比,靠泊船使用岸电在减少NOx排放方面具有明显优势。在减少颗粒物,减少SO_(X)和CO_(2)排放方面,两种措施之间没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号