...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Moving Forward in Space and Time: How Strong is the Conceptual Link between Spatial and Temporal Frames of Reference?
【24h】

Moving Forward in Space and Time: How Strong is the Conceptual Link between Spatial and Temporal Frames of Reference?

机译:在时空上前进:时空参照系之间的概念联系有多牢固?

获取原文
           

摘要

People often use spatial vocabulary to describe temporal relations, and this increasingly has motivated attempts to map spatial frames of reference (FoRs) onto time. Recent research suggested that speech communities, which differ in how they conceptualize space, may also differ in how they conceptualize time and, more specifically, that the preferences for spatial FoRs should carry over to the domain of time. Here, we scrutinize this assumption (a) by reviewing data from recent studies on temporal references, (b) by comparing data we had collected in previous studies on preferences for spatial and temporal FoRs in four languages, (c) by analyzing new data from dynamic spatial tasks that resemble the temporal tasks more closely, and (d) by assessing the co-variation of individual preferences of English speakers across space and time. While the first set of data paints a mixed picture, the latter three do not support the assumption of a close link between referencing preferences across domains. We explore possible reasons for this lack of consistency and discuss implications for research on temporal references.
机译:人们经常使用空间词汇来描述时间关系,这越来越促使人们尝试将空间参考框架(FoR)映射到时间上。最近的研究表明,语音社区在空间概念上的方式不同,在时间概念上的方式也可能不同,更具体地说,对空间FoR的偏好应延续到时间域。在这里,我们通过以下方式对这一假设进行审查:(a)通过审查来自时间参考的最新研究中的数据,(b)通过比较我们先前在四种语言中对时空FoR偏好的研究中收集的数据,(c)通过分析来自类似于时间任务的动态空间任务,以及(d)通过评估英语使用者在时空上的个人偏好在时间和空间上的共变关系。虽然第一组数据描绘了一个混杂的画面,但后三个数据不支持跨域引用首选项之间存在紧密联系的假设。我们探讨了缺乏一致性的可能原因,并讨论了对时间参考研究的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号