...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Finding retrieval-induced forgetting in recognition tests: a case for baseline memory strength
【24h】

Finding retrieval-induced forgetting in recognition tests: a case for baseline memory strength

机译:在识别测试中发现由检索引起的遗忘:基线记忆力的一种情况

获取原文
           

摘要

Retrieval practice of previously studied material can impair subsequent memory for related unpracticed material. An emerging view holds that such retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) may affect episodic recollection, but not the context-free familiarity of the affected items. Here, a survey of accruing recent findings of RIF in recognition tests shows that the impairment of unpracticed material depends vitally on baseline memory strength. Therein, the absence of RIF under specific conditions, previously taken as evidence for the immunity of familiarity, can be predicted on grounds of exceedingly low baseline levels. Similarly, differential RIF effects on the parameters of dual-process recognition models can be explained by baseline differences, suggesting that RIF might impair any sub-process that substantially contributes to overall recognition accuracy. By contrast, the strengthening of practiced material appears independent of baseline levels and does not predict the magnitude of RIF, in accordance with an inhibitory causation of the forgetting. In summary, the inventory presents RIF in recognition as a subtle proportional impairment, future illumination of which may demand increased attention to baseline memory levels.
机译:先前研究过的材料的检索实践可能会损害随后对相关未实践材料的记忆。新兴的观点认为,这种取回引起的遗忘(RIF)可能会影响情节回忆,但不会影响受影响项目的上下文无关性。在这里,一项对RIF在识别测试中的最新发现的调查表明,未练习的材料的损伤在很大程度上取决于基线记忆力。其中,可以基于基线水平极低的原因来预测在特定条件下不存在RIF(以前被视为熟悉免疫力的证据)。同样,可以通过基线差异来解释RIF对双过程识别模型参数的不同影响,这表明RIF可能会损害任何对总体识别准确度有重大贡献的子过程。相比之下,根据对遗忘的抑制性原因,实践材料的增强似乎与基线水平无关,并且不能预测RIF的大小。总而言之,清单将RIF识别为微不足道的比例减损,其未来的光照可能需要更多地关注基线内存水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号