首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >A re-analysis of the relationship between a??parasite stressa?? and authoritarianism
【24h】

A re-analysis of the relationship between a??parasite stressa?? and authoritarianism

机译:重新分析“寄生虫压力”与“压力”之间的关系。和威权主义

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper is a commentary on Murray et al. (2013) where, alongside other findings, data from two cross-cultural samples (nations and cultures), supporting a positive relationship between pathogen prevalence and authoritarianism are presented. This commentary is not a theoretical critique (see the comments on Fincher and Thornhill, 2012, for example, or an alternative: Hackman and Hruschka, 2013). Nor is it a methodological critique of work on pathogen stress (e.g., Currie and Mace, 2012; Pollet, 2013; Pollet et al., in press). The goal of this brief commentary is to re-analyze the data with an alternative technique to examine whether the original conclusions are upheld, specifically the claim that indices of pathogen prevalence are positively related to authoritarianism. To this end, I use a relatively novel technique from machine learning: “Conditional inference trees.”.
机译:本文是对Murray等人的评论。 (2013),与其他发现一起,从两个跨文化样本(民族和文化)中获得数据,证明病原体流行率与专制主义之间存在正相关关系。该评论不是理论上的批评(例如,请参见有关Fincher和Thornhill,2012的评论,或其他评论:Hackman和Hruschka,2013)。这也不是对病原体压力工作的方法学批判(例如Currie和Mace,2012; Pollet,2013; Pollet等人,印刷中)。这篇简短评论的目的是使用另一种技术来重新分析数据,以检查原始结论是否成立,尤其是病原体流行指数与威权主义正相关的主张。为此,我使用了一种来自机器学习的相对新颖的技术:“条件推理树”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号