首页> 外文期刊>E3S Web of Conferences >Comparing Value of Urban Green Space Using Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Methods
【24h】

Comparing Value of Urban Green Space Using Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Methods

机译:使用或有估价法和差旅成本法比较城市绿地的价值

获取原文
           

摘要

Green urban open space are an important element of the city. They gives multiple benefits for social life, human health, biodiversity, air quality, carbon sequestration, and water management. Travel Cost Method (TCM) and Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) are the most frequently used method in various studies that assess environmental good and services in monetary term for valuing urban green space. Both of those method are determined the value of urban green space through willingness to pay (WTP) for ecosystem benefit and collected data through direct interview and questionnaire. Findings of this study showed the weaknesses and strengths of both methods for valuing urban green space and provided factors influencing the probability of user’s willingness to pay in each method.
机译:绿色的城市开放空间是城市的重要元素。它们为社会生活,人类健康,生物多样性,空气质量,固碳和水管理提供了多种好处。差旅成本法(TCM)和或有估价法(CVM)是各种研究中最常用的方法,这些研究以货币形式评估环境商品和服务,以评估城市绿色空间。这两种方法都是通过为生态系统效益付费的意愿(WTP)确定城市绿地的价值,并通过直接访谈和问卷调查收集数据。这项研究的结果表明,两种方法都无法评估城市绿色空间,并提供了影响用户使用每种方法支付意愿的可能性的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号