...
首页> 外文期刊>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science >Corneal thickness and Intraocular pressure After DSAEK: comparison of Dynamic Contour tonometry with Goldmann Applanation tonometry
【24h】

Corneal thickness and Intraocular pressure After DSAEK: comparison of Dynamic Contour tonometry with Goldmann Applanation tonometry

机译:DSAEK后的角膜厚度和眼内压:动态轮廓眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较

获取原文

摘要

Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements with dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) after Descemeta??s stripping automated keratoplasty (DSAEK). Methods: Transverse observational study of 22 eyes of 19 patients with successful DSAEK. IOP was measured with DCT and GAT and central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined using anterior chamber OCT. IOP measurements were compared and the CCT influence was evaluated. A control group with 22 eyes of 17 patients was also created. Results: Mean IOP in pressure in patients with DSAEK evaluated by GAT was 13,9?±3,7 and 17,4?±3,3 with DCT. Mean CCT in these patients was 601,8?±58,9. In the control group mean IOP evaluated by GAT was 13,5?±2,4 and by DCT was 16,5?±2,6. In this group mean CCT was 535,1?±39,1. The IOP values obtained with DCT were in average higher than those obtained with GAT in both samples. The difference between the two IOP evaluating methods was similar in both groups. In the group of patients with DSAEK, no statiscally significant correlation was found between CCT and the different IOP evaluating methods. Conclusions: The IOP difference between GAT and TCD was not influenced in a statistically significant way by the CCT that was artificially increased in the patients with DSAEK. Therefore, both GAT and CCT can be used safely and reliably in these patients.
机译:目的:在Descemeta剥离自动角膜成形术(DSAEK)后,将眼压(IOP)测量值与动态轮廓眼压计(DCT)和戈德曼压平眼压计(GAT)进行比较。方法:19例成功DSAEK患者的22只眼的横向观察研究。使用DCT和GAT测量IOP,并使用前房OCT确定中央角膜厚度(CCT)。比较IOP测量值并评估CCT影响。还建立了具有17只患者的22只眼睛的对照组。结果:通过GAT评估,DSAEK患者的平均IOP压力为DCT的13,9±3,7和17,4±±3,3。这些患者的平均CCT为601,8?±58,9。在对照组中,通过GAT评估的平均IOP为13.5±2.4,通过DCT评估的平均IOP为16.5±2.6。在该组中,平均CCT为535,1?±39,1。在两个样品中,用DCT测得的IOP值平均高于用GAT测得的IOP值。两种眼压评估方法之间的差异在两组中相似。在DSAEK患者组中,CCT和不同的IOP评估方法之间没有发现明显的相关性。结论:GCT和TCD之间的IOP差异没有受到CCT的统计学显着影响,而CCT在DSAEK患者中人为增加。因此,GAT和CCT均可安全可靠地用于这些患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号