...
首页> 外文期刊>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science >Mechanisms of Vertical Fusional Vergence in Patients With a??Congenital Superior Oblique Paresisa?? Investigated With an Eye-Tracking Haploscope
【24h】

Mechanisms of Vertical Fusional Vergence in Patients With a??Congenital Superior Oblique Paresisa?? Investigated With an Eye-Tracking Haploscope

机译:先天性上斜斜肌麻痹患者垂直融合充盈的机制用眼动追踪镜进行调查

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To determine the mechanisms of vertical fusional vergence in patients with a??congenital unilateral superior oblique paresisa?? (SOP) and to discuss the implications of these mechanisms. Methods: Eleven patients were examined with our eye-tracking haploscope. Results: Three different fusion mechanisms were found, producing significantly different cyclovergence to vertical vergence ratios (P 0.05): primary use of the vertical rectus muscles in seven patients (ratio: 0.36 ?± 1.6), primary use of the oblique muscles in one patient (0.04), and use of the superior oblique muscle in the higher eye and the superior rectus muscle in the lower eye in three patients (1.15 ?± 0.32). Lancaster red-green testing showed alignment differences among these groups, primarily differences in amount of subjective extorsion between the two eyes in straight-ahead gaze: The patient with oblique-musclea??mediated fusion showed essentially no subjective extorsion (0.5?°), the patients with vertical-rectus-musclea??mediated vertical fusion showed a mean ?± SD subjective extorsion of 3.6?° ?± 1.4?°, and the patients with the mixed (oblique/rectus) fusion mechanism showed 7.0?° ?± 1.7?° (P 0.05). Conclusions: The choice of fusion mechanism may be a function of how much intorting effect is needed. Use of the oblique muscles bilaterally causes the least intorting effect, use of the vertical rectus muscles bilaterally adds more intorting effect, and activation of the a??paretica?? superior oblique muscle in the higher eye and the superior rectus muscle in the lower eye provides the greatest intorting effect. Subclassifying a??congenital SOPa?? in this way (in which the a??paretica?? muscle may remain functional in many cases) may help guide its optimal surgical correction.
机译:目的:确定先天性单侧上斜肌麻痹患者垂直融合融合的机制。 (SOP)并讨论这些机制的含义。方法:我们的眼动追踪镜检查了11例患者。结果:发现了三种不同的融合机制,产生了不同的环汇和垂直汇聚比率(P <0.05):七名患者主要使用垂直直肌肌肉(比率:0.36±±1.6),一人主要使用斜肌(0.04),三位患者使用上斜肌上斜肌,下眼使用直肌上斜肌(1.15±0.32)。 Lancaster红绿色测试显示这些组之间的对准差异,主要是直视时两只眼睛的主观勒索量不同:斜肌介导融合的患者基本上没有主观勒索(0.5?°),垂直-直肠-肌肉介导的垂直融合患者的平均±±SD主观勒索为3.6?°±±1.4?°,而混合(斜/直肠)融合机制的患者则为7.0?°±± 1.7°°(P <0.05)。结论:融合机制的选择可能取决于需要多少引入作用。双侧使用斜肌引起最小的扭曲作用,双侧使用垂直直肌则增加更多的扭曲作用,并激活a-paretica?高眼上斜肌和下眼上直肌具有最大的扭曲作用。对“先天性SOPA”进行子分类以这种方式(在许多情况下,无足轻肌)可能仍保持功能)可能有助于指导其最佳手术矫正。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号