首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications >Comparison of Cost Estimation Methods using Hybrid Artificial Intelligence on Schematic Design Stage: RANFIS and CBR-GA
【24h】

Comparison of Cost Estimation Methods using Hybrid Artificial Intelligence on Schematic Design Stage: RANFIS and CBR-GA

机译:在方案设计阶段使用混合人工智能的成本估算方法的比较:RANFIS和CBR-GA

获取原文
           

摘要

Cost estimating at schematic design stage as the basis of project evaluation, engineering design, and cost management, plays an important role in project decision under a limited definition of scope and constraints in available information and time, and the presence of uncertainties. The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of cost estimation models of two different hybrid artificial intelligence approaches: regression analysis-adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (RANFIS) and case based reasoning-genetic algorithm (CBRGA) techniques. The models were developed based on the same 50 low-cost apartment project datasets in Indonesia. Tested on another five testing data, the models were proven to perform very well in term of accuracy. A CBR-GA model was found to be the best performer but suffered from disadvantage of needing 15 cost drivers if compared to only 4 cost drivers required by RANFIS for on-par performance.
机译:在原理图设计阶段的成本估算是项目评估,工程设计和成本管理的基础,在可用信息和时间的范围和约束定义有限以及存在不确定性的情况下,在项目决策中起着重要作用。这项研究的目的是比较两种不同的混合人工智能方法的成本估算模型的性能:回归分析自适应神经模糊推理系统(RANFIS)和基于案例的推理遗传算法(CBRGA)技术。这些模型是根据印度尼西亚的50个低成本公寓项目数据集开发的。在另外五个测试数据上进行了测试,这些模型被证明在准确性方面表现非常出色。人们发现,CBR-GA模型的性能最佳,但缺点是需要15个成本动因,而RANFIS仅需要4个成本动因才能达到标准性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号