...
首页> 外文期刊>Infection and immunity >Failure to Detect Hemagglutination-Inhibiting Antibodies with Intact Avian Influenza Virions
【24h】

Failure to Detect Hemagglutination-Inhibiting Antibodies with Intact Avian Influenza Virions

机译:未能检测到具有完整禽流感病毒颗粒的血凝抑制抗体

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Avian influenza viruses replicate in a variety of mammals and birds, yet hemagglutination inhibition tests show that postinfection sera from these animals (e.g., ferrets and ducks) have insignificant levels of antibodies (Hinshaw et al., Infect. Immun. 34:354-361, 1981). This suggested that avian influenza viruses, in contrast to mammalian viruses, may not induce a significant humoral response. Studies reported here indicate that avian influenza viruses do induce high levels of antibodies in ferrets, ducks, and mice and produce long-lived memory for cytotoxic T-cells in mice. The failure to detect hemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies to avian viruses was explained by the finding that antibodies to avian influenza viruses were not detectable in hemagglutination inhibition tests with intact virus yet were readily demonstrable when hemagglutinin subunits were used. In addition, these sera contained high levels of neutralizing antibodies to the avian virus. These findings suggest that the hemagglutinins of avian and mammalian influenza viruses may differ in their accessibility to antibodies or the biological consequence of antibody attachment or both. The practical consequence of these studies is that hemagglutination inhibition tests with intact avian viruses fail to detect antibody and do not correlate with virus neutralization. The avian virus used in these studies, A/Mallard/NY/6870/78 (H2N2), replicated and caused mortality in BALB/c mice, emphasizing that the host range and virulence of avian viruses extends to mammals. The above findings suggest that avian viruses could infect mammals in nature, yet seroepidemiological studies with conventional hemagglutination inhibition tests could give misleading results.
机译:禽流感病毒可在多种哺乳动物和鸟类中复制,但是血凝抑制测试表明,这些动物(例如雪貂和鸭)的感染后血清中抗体的含量微不足道(Hinshaw等人,Infect。Immun。34:354-361) (1981年)。这表明与哺乳动物病毒相反,禽流感病毒可能不会引起明显的体液反应。此处报道的研究表明,禽流感病毒确实会在雪貂,鸭和小鼠中诱导高水平的抗体,并对小鼠的细胞毒性T细胞产生长效记忆。发现针对禽流感病毒的血凝抑制抗体失败的原因是发现针对禽流感病毒的抗体在完整病毒的血凝抑制试验中无法检测到,但在使用血凝素亚基时很容易证明。另外,这些血清含有高水平的针对禽病毒的中和抗体。这些发现表明,禽流感和哺乳动物流感病毒的血凝素在抗体的可及性或抗体附着的生物学后果或两者上可能有所不同。这些研究的实际结果是,用完整的禽病毒进行的血凝抑制测试无法检测抗体,并且与病毒中和无关。在这些研究中使用的禽病毒A / Mallard / NY / 6870/78(H2N2)在BALB / c小鼠中复制并引起死亡,强调禽病毒的宿主范围和毒力延伸至哺乳动物。上述发现表明,禽病毒可以感染自然界的哺乳动物,但是采用常规血凝抑制试验进行的血清流行病学研究可能会产生误导性的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号