...
首页> 外文期刊>Infection and immunity >Cellular Immune Responses in Guinea Pigs Immunized with Cell Walls of Histoplasma capsulatum Prepared by Several Different Procedures
【24h】

Cellular Immune Responses in Guinea Pigs Immunized with Cell Walls of Histoplasma capsulatum Prepared by Several Different Procedures

机译:用几种不同方法制备的荚膜组织胞浆菌细胞壁免疫的豚鼠的细胞免疫应答

获取原文
           

摘要

Since guinea pigs immunized with water-washed cell walls of Histoplasma capsulatum developed cellular immune responses detectable with cytoplasmic substances, attempts were made to determine whether cytoplasmic contamination of the walls was responsible for the induction of the immune response. Cell walls were treated by several procedures designed to remove possible contamination, namely, extraction with lipid solvents, incubation with proteolytic enzymes, and washing with sodium dodecyl sulfate, and each of the treated preparations was compared with water-washed walls for its ability to induce cellular responses demonstrable with cytoplasmic substances. For comparison, wall glycoprotein was also used as a test antigen. Immune responses were assessed by gross and histological examinations of skin test sites and by assays for the production of migration inhibition factor. A portion of the material inducing the response detectable with cytoplasmic substances was apparently removed or altered by each of the purifying procedures. The cellular immune responses to wall glycoprotein were also altered, however, indicating that more than the mere removal of cytoplasmic substances had occurred. On the basis of the data collected from each of the cellular assays involving wall glycoprotein as the test antigen, the hypothesis is proposed that sodium dodecyl sulfate altered or removed protein from the wall and thus augmented its ability to induce a more intense immediate-type hypersensitivity, whereas incubation with Pronase altered the walls in such a way as to shift the balance toward a more intense delayed-type hypersensitivity. The latter effect was probably due to the removal of carbohydrate from the wall by glucanase or to mannosidase contaminating the Pronase preparation.
机译:由于用荚膜组织胞浆水洗过的细胞壁进行免疫的豚鼠产生了可被细胞质物质检测到的细胞免疫反应,因此人们试图确定细胞壁的细胞质污染是否是引起免疫反应的原因。通过设计用于去除可能污染的几种程序处理细胞壁,即用脂质溶剂提取,用蛋白水解酶孵育,用十二烷基硫酸钠洗涤,然后将每种处理的制剂与水洗壁的诱导能力进行比较。细胞质物质可证明细胞反应。为了比较,壁糖蛋白也用作测试抗原。通过皮肤测试部位的肉眼和组织学检查以及通​​过测定迁移抑制因子的测定来评估免疫应答。每种纯化程序显然除去或改变了部分诱导细胞质物质可检测到反应的物质。然而,对壁糖蛋白的细胞免疫反应也发生了变化,这表明发生的不仅仅是细胞质物质的去除。根据从涉及壁糖蛋白作为测试抗原的每种细胞分析收集的数据,提出以下假说:十二烷基硫酸钠改变或去除了壁上的蛋白质,从而增强了其诱导更强烈的即刻型超敏反应的能力。 ,而用Pronase孵育会改变壁,使平衡朝更强烈的迟发型超敏反应转移。后一种作用可能是由于葡聚糖酶从壁上去除了碳水化合物或甘露糖苷酶污染了链霉菌蛋白酶制剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号