...
首页> 外文期刊>IFAC PapersOnLine >Haptic shared steering control with an adaptive level of authority based on time-to-line crossing ?
【24h】

Haptic shared steering control with an adaptive level of authority based on time-to-line crossing ?

机译:触觉共享转向控制,具有基于到线时间穿越的自适应权限级别

获取原文
           

摘要

Traditional driver-automation interaction trades control over the vehicle back and forth between driver and automation. Haptic shared control offers an alternative by continuously sharing the control through torques on the steering wheel and pedals. When designing additional feedback torques, part of the design choice lies in the stiffness around the neutral steering point: also called the Level of Haptic Authority (LoHA), which is usually static and tuned to balance safety benefits (better at high LoHA) with conflicts torques in case of different intentions between automation and driver (higher conflict torques with increased LoHA). In this paper we explore the idea of situation-adaptive LoHA: in this case during lane-keeping by changing the LoHA based on time to lane crossing (TLC). Consequently, when safety margins are high (e.g., when driving on a wide road) the LoHA is low, but the LoHA would only increase when safety margins decrease. We propose two alternative design approaches to apply the LoHA: symmetrically and asymmetrically (i.e., only increase of LoHA in the direction of the low TLC). We compared these design in an explorative driving simulator study (n=14) to driving with two static LoHA designs (low and high). We found that compared to the high LoHA controller, both adaptive LoHA controllers designs resulted in similar safety margins, but at decreased conflict torques. Hence, a TLC-based adaptive LoHA controller seems to be an effective approach to mitigate conflicts while maintaining the safety benefits associated with HSC.
机译:传统的驾驶员-自动化交互在驾驶员和自动化之间来回控制车辆。触觉共享控制通过方向盘和踏板上的扭矩连续共享控制来提供替代方案。在设计附加的反馈转矩时,部分设计选择取决于中性转向点周围的刚度:也称为触觉权威水平(LoHA),通常是静态的,并进行了调整以平衡安全利益(在较高LoHA时更好)与冲突自动化和驾驶员意图不同时的最大扭矩(较高的冲突扭矩和更高的LoHA)。在本文中,我们探索了情境自适应LoHA的概念:在这种情况下,通过基于穿越车道的时间(TLC)更改LoHA,在车道保持期间。因此,当安全裕度较高时(例如,在宽阔的道路上行驶时),LoHA较低,但LoHA仅在安全裕度减小时才会增加。我们提出了两种应用LoHA的替代设计方法:对称和不对称(即仅在低TLC方向上增加LoHA)。我们在一项探索性驾驶模拟器研究(n = 14)中将这些设计与两个静态LoHA设计(低和高)进行了比较。我们发现,与高LoHA控制器相比,两种自适应LoHA控制器设计均具有相似的安全裕度,但冲突转矩却有所降低。因此,基于TLC的自适应LoHA控制器似乎是减轻冲突并保持与HSC相关的安全利益的有效方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号