首页> 外文期刊>Astronomy and astrophysics >The EDIBLES survey II. The detectability of C 60 + bands
【24h】

The EDIBLES survey II. The detectability of C 60 + bands

机译:EDIBLES调查II。 C 60 + 条带的可检测性

获取原文
           

摘要

Gas phase spectroscopic laboratory experiments for the buckminsterfullerene cation C_(60)~(+)have resulted in accurate rest wavelengths for five C_(60)~(+)transitions that have been compared with diffuse interstellar bands (DIBs) in the near infra-red. Detecting these in astronomical spectra is difficult because of the strong contamination of ground-based spectra by atmospheric water vapor, to the presence of weak and shallow stellar lines and/or blending with other weak DIBs. The detection of the two strong bands has been claimed by several teams, and the three additional and weaker bands have been detected in a few sources. Certain recent papers have argued against the identification of C_(60)~(+)based on spectral analyses claiming (i) a large variation in the ratio of the equivalent widths of the 9632 and 9577 ? bands, (ii) a large redshift of the 9632 ? band for the Orion star HD 37022, and (iii) the non-detection of the weaker 9428 ? DIB. Here we address these three points: (i) We show that the model stellar line correction for the 9632 ? DIB overestimates the difference between the strengths of the lines in giant and dwarf star spectra, casting doubts on the conclusions about the ratio variability. (ii) Using high quality stellar spectra from the ESO Diffuse Interstellar Bands Large Exploration Survey (EDIBLES), recorded with the ESO/Paranal Ultraviolet Echelle Spectrograph (UVES) in about the same atmospheric conditions, we find no wavelength shift in the 9632 ? band toward HD 37022. (iii) Using EDIBLES spectra and data from the Echelle SpectroPolarimetric Device for the Observation of Stars (ESPaDOnS) at CFHT we show that the presence of a weak 9428 ? band cannot be ruled out, even in the same observations that a previous study claimed it was not present.
机译:buckminsterfullerene阳离子C_(60)〜(+)的气相光谱实验室实验已得出五个C_(60)〜(+)跃迁的准确静止波长,已将其与近红外弥散星际带(DIB)进行了比较。红。由于大气水蒸气对地面光谱的强烈污染,存在弱而浅的恒星线和/或与其他弱DIB混合,很难在天文光谱中检测到这些光谱。多个团队声称已检测到两个强带,并且在几个来源中发现了三个额外的弱带。最近的某些论文反对基于光谱分析的C_(60)〜(+)的识别,声称(i)9632和9577的等效宽度之比有很大变化?波段,(ii)9632的大红移? Orion星HD 37022的波段,以及(iii)未检测到较弱的9428? DIB。在这里,我们要解决以下三点:(i)我们展示了9632的模型恒星线校正。 DIB高估了巨星光谱和矮星光谱中谱线强度之间的差异,这使人们对比率变异性的结论产生了怀疑。 (ii)使用ESO /副紫外Echelle光谱仪(UVES)记录的ESO漫射星际带大探索调查(EDIBLES)的高质量恒星光谱,我们发现在9632? (iii)利用EDIBLES光谱和CFHT上Echelle SpectroPolarimetric观测恒星的仪器(ESPaDOnS)的数据,我们发现弱的9428?存在。即使在以前的研究声称它不存在的相同观察中,也不能排除该带。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号